Literature DB >> 21827524

Response shift in oral health-related quality of life measurement in patients with partial edentulism.

A Kimura1, H Arakawa, K Noda, S Yamazaki, E S Hara, T Mino, Y Matsuka, R Mulligan, T Kuboki.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine whether a response shift was observable after partial denture treatment and to identify the predictors that influenced the response shift magnitude and direction. A total of 173 consecutive patients with no more than eight missing teeth who received implant-supported, fixed or removable partial dentures at Okayama University Dental Hospital were asked to complete a full-version Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) questionnaire before (pre-test) and after treatment (post-test). Additionally, a short form (then-test) consisting of seven questions selected from the full version had its reliability verified and was utilised to retrospectively assess the pre-treatment OHRQoL status. The difference between the summary scores of the then-test and the pre-test determined the response shift magnitude and direction. The then-test mean score (22·9 ± 6·6) was significantly lower (worse OHRQoL) than that of the pre-test (26·4 ± 5·2). The response shift effect size was of moderate magnitude and negative direction (d = -0·78). A multiple regression analysis showed that age (younger patients) (P < 0·01), number of replaced teeth (fewer) (P < 0·01) and pre-test scores (lower) (P < 0·01) were the significant predictors for response shift. In conclusion, a response shift phenomenon with negative and moderate effect size was observed after partial denture treatment. The significant predictor variables were young age, fewer numbers of replaced teeth and lower pre-test scores.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21827524     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02241.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  7 in total

Review 1.  An overview of children's oral health-related quality of life assessment: from scale development to measuring outcomes.

Authors:  M W Genderson; L Sischo; K Markowitz; D Fine; H L Broder
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Validation of the prosthetic esthetic index.

Authors:  Esben B Özhayat; Katrine Dannemand
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of quality of life and oral hygiene attitudes of individuals using dental prostheses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Kubra Degirmenci; Oya Kalaycioglu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Using classification and regression tree modelling to investigate response shift patterns in dentine hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Carolina Machuca; Mario V Vettore; Marta Krasuska; Sarah R Baker; Peter G Robinson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Does oral health-related quality of life of patients after solid organ transplantation indicate a response shift? Results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Gerhard Schmalz; Jens Garbade; Otto Kollmar; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Longitudinal measurement invariance in prospective oral health-related quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Daniel R Reissmann; Mike T John; Leah Feuerstahler; Kazuyoshi Baba; Gyula Szabó; Asja Čelebić; Niels Waller
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  How peoples' ratings of dental implant treatment change over time?

Authors:  Carolina Machuca; Mario V Vettore; Peter G Robinson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.