Literature DB >> 21827331

Me against we: in-group transgression, collective shame, and in-group-directed hostility.

Paul K Piff1, Andres G Martinez, Dacher Keltner.   

Abstract

People can experience great distress when a group to which they belong (in-group) is perceived to have committed an immoral act. We hypothesised that people would direct hostility toward a transgressing in-group whose actions threaten their self-image and evoke collective shame. Consistent with this theorising, three studies found that reminders of in-group transgression provoked several expressions of in-group-directed hostility, including in-group-directed hostile emotion (Studies 1 and 2), in-group-directed derogation (Study 2), and in-group-directed punishment (Study 3). Across studies, collective shame-but not the related group-based emotion collective guilt-mediated the relationship between in-group transgression and in-group-directed hostility. Implications for group-based emotion, social identity, and group behaviour are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21827331     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2011.595394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  3 in total

1.  Can perspective-taking reduce crime? Examining a pathway through empathic-concern and guilt-proneness.

Authors:  Andres G Martinez; Jeffrey Stuewig; June P Tangney
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-10-16

2.  Dying the right-way? Interest in and perceived persuasiveness of parochial extremist propaganda increases after mortality salience.

Authors:  Lena Frischlich; Diana Rieger; Maia Hein; Gary Bente
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-14

3.  Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments.

Authors:  Kyriaki Fousiani; Vincent Yzerbyt; Nour-Sami Kteily; Stéphanie Demoulin
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-01-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.