Literature DB >> 21826086

Background gene expression networks significantly enhance drug response prediction by transcriptional profiling.

A Torkamani1, N J Schork.   

Abstract

A central goal of gene expression studies coupled with drug response screens is to identify predictive profiles that can be exploited to stratify patients. Numerous methods have been proposed towards this end, most of them focusing on novel statistical methods and model selection techniques that attempt to uncover groups of genes, whose expression profiles are directly and robustly correlated with drug response. However, biological systems process information through the crosstalk of multiple signaling networks, whose ultimate phenotypic consequences may only be determined by the combined input of relevant interacting systems. By restricting predictive signatures to direct gene-drug correlations, biologically meaningful interactions that may serve as superior predictors are ignored. Here we demonstrate that predictive signatures, which incorporate the interaction between background gene expression patterns and individual predictive probes, can provide superior models than those that directly relate gene expression levels to pharmacological response, and thus should be more widely utilized in pharmacogenetic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21826086      PMCID: PMC4846279          DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2011.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J        ISSN: 1470-269X            Impact factor:   3.550


  26 in total

1.  Chemosensitivity prediction by transcriptional profiling.

Authors:  J E Staunton; D K Slonim; H A Coller; P Tamayo; M J Angelo; J Park; U Scherf; J K Lee; W O Reinhold; J N Weinstein; J P Mesirov; E S Lander; T R Golub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Independent component analysis: mining microarray data for fundamental human gene expression modules.

Authors:  Jesse M Engreitz; Bernie J Daigle; Jonathan J Marshall; Russ B Altman
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Transcript and protein expression profiles of the NCI-60 cancer cell panel: an integromic microarray study.

Authors:  Uma T Shankavaram; William C Reinhold; Satoshi Nishizuka; Sylvia Major; Daisaku Morita; Krishna K Chary; Mark A Reimers; Uwe Scherf; Ari Kahn; Douglas Dolginow; Jeffrey Cossman; Eric P Kaldjian; Dominic A Scudiero; Emanuel Petricoin; Lance Liotta; Jae K Lee; John N Weinstein
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 5.  Anti-HIV drugs for cancer therapeutics: back to the future?

Authors:  Warren A Chow; Chunling Jiang; Min Guan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  The p53 network.

Authors:  M L Agarwal; W R Taylor; M V Chernov; O B Chernova; G R Stark
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-01-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen.

Authors:  Robert H Shoemaker
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Germline mutations in TMEM127 confer susceptibility to pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Yuejuan Qin; Li Yao; Elizabeth E King; Kalyan Buddavarapu; Romina E Lenci; E Sandra Chocron; James D Lechleiter; Meghan Sass; Neil Aronin; Francesca Schiavi; Francesca Boaretto; Giuseppe Opocher; Rodrigo A Toledo; Sergio P A Toledo; Charles Stiles; Ricardo C T Aguiar; Patricia L M Dahia
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Cancer cells and normal cells differ in their requirements for Thoc1.

Authors:  Yanping Li; Athena W Lin; Xiaojing Zhang; Yanqing Wang; Xiaoling Wang; David W Goodrich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Population structure and eigenanalysis.

Authors:  Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price; David Reich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Concept of pharmacogenomics and future considerations.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur; Sandeep Grover; Ritushree Kukreti
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 2.  Integrated Genomic Medicine: A Paradigm for Rare Diseases and Beyond.

Authors:  N J Schork; K Nazor
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.944

3.  A multi-site feasibility study for personalized medicine in canines with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Noel R Monks; David M Cherba; Steven G Kamerling; Heather Simpson; Anthony W Rusk; Derrick Carter; Emily Eugster; Marie Mooney; Robert Sigler; Matthew Steensma; Tessa Grabinski; Keith R Marotti; Craig P Webb
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Machine learning prediction of cancer cell sensitivity to drugs based on genomic and chemical properties.

Authors:  Michael P Menden; Francesco Iorio; Mathew Garnett; Ultan McDermott; Cyril H Benes; Pedro J Ballester; Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.