Literature DB >> 21826005

Hearing ability in working life and its relationship with sick leave and self-reported work productivity.

Janneke Nachtegaal1, Joost M Festen, Sophia E Kramer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reduced hearing ability has been shown to influence various aspects of daily life, such as communication, psychosocial functioning, and working life. The aim of this study is to examine the association between hearing ability in noise and both sick leave and self-reported work productivity. In addition, the relationship between hearing ability and perceived health-caused limitations at work is examined.
METHODS: Data were collected at the baseline measurement of the Dutch "National Longitudinal Study on Hearing" and at each month during a subsequent period of 3 mo. Hearing ability was determined by means of the National Hearing Test, a speech-in-noise test over the Internet using digit triplets. The sample comprised 748 workers (385 with normal hearing ability and 363 with insufficient or poor hearing ability).
RESULTS: Linear regression analyses revealed a significant adverse association between reduced hearing ability and self-reported absolute and differential productivity; for every dB signal-to-noise ratio (dB SNR) poorer hearing ability, self-rated absolute productivity for people experiencing little social support decreased by 0.054 points on a scale from 0 to 10 (b = -0.054; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.088 to -0.02). For people with less than three other chronic conditions, self-rated differential productivity also decreased significantly with decreasing hearing ability (no chronic conditions: b = -0.048 points/dB SNR on a scale from -10 to + 10, 95% CI = -0.094 to -0.001; one or two other chronic conditions: b = -0.035 points/dB SNR, 95% CI = -0.067 to -0.002). With adjustment for confounders, poorer hearing ability in noise furthermore significantly increased the odds for experiencing limitations (in the type or amount of work one could do) sometimes (odds ratio = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.07-1.21) and often to very often (odds ratio = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.05-1.45) in comparison with experiencing limitation seldom to never. A higher level of need for recovery among people with poorer hearing ability appeared to be one of the factors mediating the higher odds for sick leave of more than 5 days.
CONCLUSION: Reduced hearing ability in noise was significantly associated with a lower self-reported absolute and differential productivity in specific cases. Also, poorer hearing increased the odds for experiencing health-caused limitations in the type or amount of work one can do. The significant relationship between hearing ability and sick leave, which was found when not adjusting for confounders, could partly be explained by a higher need for recovery among people with reduced hearing ability in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21826005     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228033e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  17 in total

Review 1.  A Taxonomy of Fatigue Concepts and Their Relation to Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Graham Naylor; Fred H Bess
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Hearing loss, sick leave, and disability pension: findings from the HUNT follow-up study.

Authors:  Astrid Ytrehus Jørgensen; Lisa Aarhus; Bo Engdahl; Bernt Bratsberg; Vegard Fykse Skirbekk; Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.135

3.  Cost-effectiveness of a vocational enablement protocol for employees with hearing impairment; design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Arjenne H M Gussenhoven; Johannes R Anema; S Theo Goverts; Judith E Bosmans; Joost M Festen; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Predicting hearing aid use in adults: the Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Authors:  Lauren K Dillard; Amy L Cochran; Alex Pinto; Cynthia G Fowler; Mary E Fischer; Ted S Tweed; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.437

5.  Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah E Hughes; Frances L Rapport; Isabelle Boisvert; Catherine M McMahon; Hayley A Hutchings
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Effectiveness of an online SUpport PRogramme (SUPR) for older hearing aid users: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Janine Fj Meijerink; Marieke Pronk; Bernadette Paulissen; Birgit I Witte; Bregje van der Wouden; Vera Jansen; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The Influence of Social Interaction and Physical Health on the Association Between Hearing and Depression With Age and Gender.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Mark Seeto
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Arjenne H M Gussenhoven; Johannes R Anema; Birgit I Witte; S Theo Goverts; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Oral communication in individuals with hearing impairment-considerations regarding attentional, cognitive and social resources.

Authors:  Ulrike Lemke; Sigrid Scherpiet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-17

Review 10.  Cognitive spare capacity and speech communication: a narrative overview.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.