Literature DB >> 21825969

Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits?

George N Collis1, Sarvam P TerKonda, James C Waldorf, Galen Perdikis.   

Abstract

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) slings in breast reconstruction are increasingly used but are not yet validated. This study compares immediate, expander-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of inferolateral ADM slings. There were 63 patients (106 breasts) in the ADM group and 42 patients (68 breasts) in the control group. Initial intraoperative fill volumes were significantly greater in the ADM group, median 69% full (250 mL) versus 50% full (180 mL; P < 0.001). However, the number of days to complete expansion between the 2 groups was similar. One less office visit was required to complete the fills in the ADM group (P < 0.01). Drains were removed 3 days later in the ADM group (P < 0.01). Overall complication rate was greater in the ADM group (18.9% vs. 7.4%, P < 0.05), with a slightly higher percentage of expanders requiring removal due to infection in the ADM group (5.7% vs. 4.4%, P = NS). This study suggests inferolateral ADM slings in expander-based breast reconstruction allow for significantly increased initial fill volumes and may offer an aesthetic advantage; however, its use is costly and increases complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21825969     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318225833f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  10 in total

1.  Remodeling Characteristics and Collagen Distributions of Biologic Scaffold Materials Biopsied From Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Sites.

Authors:  Jaime A Cavallo; Noopur Gangopadhyay; Jason Dudas; Andres A Roma; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jack Baty; Sara Baalman; Margaret M Frisella; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Reconstructive Breast Surgery: Survey of Current Practice among Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Pieter G L Koolen; Azra A Ashraf; Kuylhee Kim; Marc A M Mureau; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 3.  Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.

Authors:  Hugh Logan Ellis; Oluwatosin Asaolu; Vivien Nebo; Abdul Kasem
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Aseptic versus Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Daniel A Lyons; Shaun D Mendenhall; Michael W Neumeister; Paul S Cederna; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-22

5.  A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Orion P Keifer; Eugenia K Page; Alexandra Hart; Randall Rudderman; Grant W Carlson; Albert Losken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-13

6.  Optimizing Outcomes of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Review of Recent Clinical Data.

Authors:  Michael Zenn; Mark Venturi; Troy Pittman; Scott Spear; Geoffrey Gurtner; Geoffrey Robb; Alex Mesbahi; Joseph Dayan
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2017-06-12

7.  Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Inferior Deepithelialized Flap Breast Reconstruction: Equivalent Outcomes, with Increased Cost.

Authors:  Heidi H Hon; Ronnie N Mubang; Brian D Wernick; Samuel F Freedman; Jill C Stoltzfus; Lino F Miele; Stanislaw P Stawicki; W Michael Morrissey
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-06-28

8.  Evaluation of Xenograft Efficacy in Immediate Prosthesis-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nikhil Sobti; Neel Vishwanath; Victor A King; Vinay Rao; Ben Rhee; Carole S L Spake; Mimi R Borrelli; Ronald A Akiki; Karl H Breuing
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-09-28

9.  The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery.

Authors:  Hilton Becker; Jeffrey G Lind
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Is single-stage implant-based breast reconstruction (SSBR) with an acellular matrix safe?: Strattice™ or Meso Biomatrix® in SSBR.

Authors:  Nadine S Hillberg; Patrick I Ferdinandus; Rieky E G Dikmans; Bjorn Winkens; Juliette Hommes; René R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-04-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.