Literature DB >> 21825900

Perineal and pelvic anatomy of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: cadaveric dissection.

Halil İbrahim Açar1, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circumferential margin positivity and tumor perforations are the main reasons for the poor oncological outcome following standard abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. The extralevator abdominoperineal excision approach has been developed to avoid "coning down" or "surgical waisting"; however, surgical education in this area has been neglected.
PURPOSE: This study aims to define correct surgical anatomical planes for extralevator abdominoperineal excision and show the differences in excision planes between standard and extralevator abdominoperineal excision. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Macroscopic surgical dissections were performed in a clinical anatomy laboratory. The dissections were recorded as video clips.
METHODS: In accordance with the surgical technique of extralevator abdominoperineal excision, abdominal and then perineal dissections were performed on 1 female and 5 male cadavers. Neurovascular, muscular, and fascial structures located in or near the excision field were carefully revealed.
RESULTS: The surgical planes of extralevator abdominoperineal excision, which widen the tumor-free margins and prevent inadvertent bowel perforation, are described in this step-by-step anatomical dissection study. Within the surgical excision planes, sacral vessels and sympathetic chains form a neurovascular network at the level of the sacrococcygeal joint. Although pelvic autonomic plexuses were away from the lateral incision line, their branches extending to urogenital organs were very close to the anterolateral dissection line. Perineal dissection showed that the internal pudendal vessels and pudendal nerve were close to the lateral excision plane. The superficial transverse perineal muscle and perineal body were the most important landmarks to determine the anterior boundary of dissection. LIMITATIONS: The study focused on the perineal dissection of extralevator abdominoperineal excision.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful extralevator abdominoperineal excision crucially depends on an accurate knowledge of surgical anatomical planes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21825900     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318224256c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

1.  Re-exploring the pelvic neuroanatomy from a new perspective and a potential guidance for TaTME: a "bottom-up" approach.

Authors:  Christiana Oikonomou; Stavros Gourgiotis; Roberto Cirocchi; Maria Piagkou; Vasilios Protogerou; Theodoros Troupis; Antonio Biondi; Pierpaolo Sileri; Dimitrios Filippou; Salomone Di Saverio
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-03

2.  Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Sun; Xianbo Yu; Haijiang Wang; Ming Ma; Zeliang Zhao; Qisan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Laparoendoscopic single site in pelvic surgery.

Authors:  Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Rafael Clavijo; Eric Barret; Rene Sotelo
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-01

4.  Preliminary Outcome of Individualized Abdominoperineal Excision for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Jia-Gang Han; Zhen-Jun Wang; Zhi-Gang Gao; Guang-Hui Wei; Zhi-Wei Zhai; Bao-Cheng Zhao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Yu Qi; Ming Cui; Mao-Xing Liu; Kai Xu; Fei Tan; Zhen-Dan Yao; Nan Zhang; Hong Yang; Cheng-Hai Zhang; Jia-Di Xing; Xiang-Qian Su
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.