Neusa Sica Rocha1,2,3, Mick J Power4,5, Donald M Bushnell6, Marcelo P Fleck2,7,3. 1. Hospital de Clı´nicas de Porto Alegre (NSR) Porto Alegre, Brazil 2. Graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Psychiatry (NSR, MPF) Porto Alegre, Brazil 3. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil (NSR, MPF) 4. Section of Health and Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (MJP) 5. Department of Psychology, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway (MJP) 6. Health Research Associates, Seattle, Washington (DMB) 7. Department of Psychiatry and Legal Medicine (MPF) Porto Alegre, Brazil
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Rasch model prescribes procedures to ensure that a scale constructed from multiple items conforms to fundamental requirements of interval scales of measurement. OBJECTIVE: To test the Rasch properties of the domains of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF) in depressed patients from primary care settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, cross-national study. SETTING: Primary care. PATIENTS: The sample consisted of 1193 patients having a confirmed diagnosis of depression from 6 countries (Australia, Brazil, Israel, Russia, Spain, and the United States) involved in the Longitudinal Investigation of Depression Outcomes (LIDO) study. MEASUREMENTS: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) diagnosed depression, whereas the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) assessed severity of depression. The WHOQOL-BREF measured generic quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Three of the 4 WHOQOL-BREF domains (physical, psychological, and environment) conform to the Rasch model expectations, following adjustments required mainly because of individual item misfit or differential item functioning (DIF) due to age or country. The social domain showed relatively poor psychometric properties, as observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The Rasch analysis demonstrated that, with some modifications, all domains of the WHOQOL-BREF, except for the social domain, provide an interval scale measure of generic subjective QOL in the context of depressed primary care patients in 6 countries worldwide.
BACKGROUND: The Rasch model prescribes procedures to ensure that a scale constructed from multiple items conforms to fundamental requirements of interval scales of measurement. OBJECTIVE: To test the Rasch properties of the domains of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF) in depressedpatients from primary care settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, cross-national study. SETTING: Primary care. PATIENTS: The sample consisted of 1193 patients having a confirmed diagnosis of depression from 6 countries (Australia, Brazil, Israel, Russia, Spain, and the United States) involved in the Longitudinal Investigation of Depression Outcomes (LIDO) study. MEASUREMENTS: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) diagnosed depression, whereas the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) assessed severity of depression. The WHOQOL-BREF measured generic quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Three of the 4 WHOQOL-BREF domains (physical, psychological, and environment) conform to the Rasch model expectations, following adjustments required mainly because of individual item misfit or differential item functioning (DIF) due to age or country. The social domain showed relatively poor psychometric properties, as observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The Rasch analysis demonstrated that, with some modifications, all domains of the WHOQOL-BREF, except for the social domain, provide an interval scale measure of generic subjective QOL in the context of depressed primary care patients in 6 countries worldwide.
Authors: H Felix Fischer; Inka Wahl; Sandra Nolte; Gregor Liegl; Elmar Brähler; Bernd Löwe; Matthias Rose Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-10-16 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Melissa J Rowthorn; D Rex Billington; Christian U Krägeloh; Jason Landon; Oleg N Medvedev Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maryam Se Hussein; Waqas Akram; Mohd Nor Mamat; Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed; Nahlah Elkudssiah Binti Ismail Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2015-04-01
Authors: Wenjun Cao; Chongzheng Guo; Weiwei Ping; Zhijun Tan; Ying Guo; Jianzhong Zheng Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Chris Gibbons; Peter Bower; Karina Lovell; Jose Valderas; Suzanne Skevington Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 5.428