Literature DB >> 21825086

Is indirect calorimetry a necessity or a luxury in the pediatric intensive care unit?

Ursula G Kyle1, Ana Arriaza, Monica Esposito, Jorge A Coss-Bu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Critically ill children differ in their energy needs from healthy children in terms of underlying metabolic derangement, comorbidities, energy reserve, and response to illness. This study determined how many pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients were candidates for indirect calorimetry (IC), per American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) recommendations.
METHODS: Admission diagnosis, demographics, type/amount of nutrition support, length of intensive care unit/hospital stay were collected. Patients were classified as candidates for IC per A.S.P.E.N. guidelines.
RESULTS: Mean (SD) age of patients (n = 150) was 6.7 (5.6) years, with PICU length of stay of 3.9 (5.3) days. IC was indicated in 72.0% (108/150) of patients during PICU days 1-7. Patients with miscellaneous (50%), neurological (73%), respiratory (81%), sepsis (83%), and oncology (100%) diagnoses were candidates for IC. Underweight/overweight/obese (32.4%), hypermetabolism (26.4%), and not meeting nutrition goals (13.7%) were the most frequent indications for IC (χ(2), P < .001). Patients (31%) met ≥2 indications for IC. Patients with neurological disease (relative risk [RR], 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-14.6), oncology patients (4.2; 1.1-15.9), respiratory patients (5.5; 2.0-16.9), and children with sepsis/septic shock/infection (5.6; 1.9-18.1) were more likely to have ≥2 indications for IC compared to those with other diagnoses.
CONCLUSIONS: Three of 4 patients were candidates for IC per A.S.P.E.N. guidelines. PICUs might have to prioritize performing IC in patients who are <2 years of age, malnourished (underweight/overweight) on admission, or PICU stay of >5 days. Future studies should determine the cost-benefit ratios of performing IC in PICU patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21825086     DOI: 10.1177/0148607111415108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Unpredictable combination of metabolic and feeding patterns in malnourished critically ill children: the malnutrition-energy assessment question.

Authors:  G Briassoulis; E Briassouli; T Tavladaki; S Ilia; D M Fitrolaki; A M Spanaki
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Alterations in metabolic patterns in critically ill patients-is there need of action?

Authors:  T Tavladaki; A M Spanaki; H Dimitriou; G Briassoulis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  The Metabolic Response to Stress and Infection in Critically Ill Children: The Opportunity of an Individualized Approach.

Authors:  Valentina De Cosmi; Gregorio Paolo Milani; Alessandra Mazzocchi; Veronica D'Oria; Marco Silano; Edoardo Calderini; Carlo Agostoni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Clinical Nutrition of Critically Ill Patients in the Context of the Latest ESPEN Guidelines.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gostyńska; Maciej Stawny; Katarzyna Dettlaff; Anna Jelińska
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  External Validation of Equations to Estimate Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Children and Adolescents with and without Malnutrition: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  George Briassoulis; Efrossini Briassouli; Stavroula Ilia; Panagiotis Briassoulis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 6.706

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.