Literature DB >> 21824714

Mesh complications following prolapse surgery: management and outcome.

Christine E Skala1, Karin Renezeder, Stefan Albrich, Alexander Puhl, Rosa M Laterza, Gert Naumann, Heinz Koelbl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This is a description of complications following prolapse surgery with the use of alloplastic materials, the management and outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: 54 women have been referred to Mainz, urogynecology referral center due to complications following mesh-augmented prolapse surgery.
RESULTS: The complaints who lead to the admission are expressed by the new terminology and standardized classification for complications arising directly from the insertion of prostheses and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery [1]. Pain (66.7%), mesh erosion (55.6%) and vaginal discharge (48.1%) were the most frequent complaints. Revision was performed after a median time of 27.2 months post mesh implantation. Nine patients underwent limited excision of the mesh, 49 had a vaginal revision with wide mesh removal and 10 had a laparotomy with wide mesh removal. After 3 months 48 patients had a follow-up, 25 could have been relieved from their complaints.
CONCLUSION: Although the incidence is low, complications after prolapse repair with mesh use are difficult to prevent, affect quality of life and often require a new surgical intervention, which should be performed by an experienced and competent surgeon.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21824714     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  7 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapsed by repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Cai Tang; Deyi Luo; Lu Yang; Hong Shen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Improvement in dyspareunia after vaginal mesh removal measured by a validated questionnaire.

Authors:  T Grisales; A L Ackerman; L J Rogo-Gupta; L Kwan; S Raz; L V Rodriguez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Assessing the use of the IUGA/ICS classification system for prosthesis/graft complications in publications from 2011 to 2015.

Authors:  Emily English; Megan Solomon; Bertha Chen; Lisa Rogo-Gupta
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Native-tissue repair of isolated primary rectocele compared with nonabsorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Lene Duch Madsen; Emil Nüssler; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Susanne Greisen; Karl Møller Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Imaging of slings and meshes.

Authors:  Ka Lai Shek; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  Efficacy of surgical revision of mesh complications in prolapse and urinary incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Claudia R Kowalik; Mariëlle M E Lakeman; Sandra E Zwolsman; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.