PURPOSE: In this study we tried to define tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning by surgical templates to perform the mandible reconstruction surgery according to the preoperative simulation. The accuracy was evaluated through cadaveric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five cadaveric mandibles and fibulas were obtained. Preoperative surgical simulation was performed. Surgical templates that defined tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning were designed and fabricated. Translation, angular deviation, and rotation of bone grafts, as well as translation of condyles, were measured. RESULTS: The reconstructed mandibles showed high similarity to the surgical planning. The mean translation, angular deviation, and rotation of fibula segments of the reconstructed mandibles were 1.35 ± 0.86 mm, 3.36° ± 1.86°, and 8.13° ± 5.35°, respectively. In the mandible remnants, the translation of condyles was measured, with a mean of 1.39 ± 0.66 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our method of defining the tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning by surgical templates was accurate enough for mandible reconstruction surgery.
PURPOSE: In this study we tried to define tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning by surgical templates to perform the mandible reconstruction surgery according to the preoperative simulation. The accuracy was evaluated through cadaveric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five cadaveric mandibles and fibulas were obtained. Preoperative surgical simulation was performed. Surgical templates that defined tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning were designed and fabricated. Translation, angular deviation, and rotation of bone grafts, as well as translation of condyles, were measured. RESULTS: The reconstructed mandibles showed high similarity to the surgical planning. The mean translation, angular deviation, and rotation of fibula segments of the reconstructed mandibles were 1.35 ± 0.86 mm, 3.36° ± 1.86°, and 8.13° ± 5.35°, respectively. In the mandible remnants, the translation of condyles was measured, with a mean of 1.39 ± 0.66 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our method of defining the tumor resection, fibula cutting, and positioning by surgical templates was accurate enough for mandible reconstruction surgery.
Authors: P Canzi; M Magnetto; S Marconi; P Morbini; S Mauramati; F Aprile; I Avato; F Auricchio; M Benazzo Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.124