Literature DB >> 21824612

Usefulness of cap-assisted colonoscopy during colonoscopic EMR: a randomized, controlled trial.

Seon-Young Park1, Hyun-Soo Kim, Kyoung-Won Yoon, Sung-Bum Cho, Wan-Sik Lee, Chang-Hwan Park, Young-Eun Joo, Sung-Kyu Choi, Jong-Sun Rew.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical demand for total colonoscopy is increasing. Several articles have reported on the usefulness of a cap for faster cecal intubation and reduced patient discomfort, but results for polyp and adenoma detection have been inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a cap attached to the tip of a colonoscope for detection and resection of polyps by experienced colonoscopists.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: A total of 329 patients who underwent colonoscopic EMR were randomized to cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) (CAC group, n = 166) or regular colonoscopy (RC) (RC group, n = 163). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Cecal intubation time, total procedure time, required time for colonoscopic EMR of each polyp, and missing polyp rate.
RESULTS: The cecal intubation time in the CAC group and RC group was 5.3 ± 3.3 minutes and 5.8 ± 3.7 minutes, respectively (P = .170). The total procedure time in the CAC group and RC group was 23.0 ± 15.5 minutes and 29.2 ± 13.4 minutes, respectively (P = .626). The time required for colonoscopic EMR of each polyp in the CAC group and RC group was 3.5 ± 4.5 minutes and 4.2 ± 5.1 minutes, respectively (P = .010). The number of polyps during the initial colonoscopy in the CAC group and RC group was 2.2 ± 1.7 and 2.0 ± 1.8, respectively (P = .221). The number of detected polyps during colonoscopic EMR in the CAC group and RC group was 3.4 ± 2.7 and 2.7 ± 1.9 (P = .003). The number of missed polyps in the CAC group and RC group was 1.1 ± 1.5 and 0.8 ± 0.9 (P = .024). LIMITATION: Single-center experience.
CONCLUSIONS: CAC may reduce the time required for colonoscopic EMR of each polyp and may also improve the polyp detection rate.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21824612     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  11 in total

1.  Hood colonoscopy in trainees: a useful adjunct to improve the performance.

Authors:  Raffaele Manta; Benedetto Mangiavillano; Paolo Fedeli; Paolo Viaggi; Danilo Castellani; Rita Conigliaro; Enzo Masci; Gabrio Bassotti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  The Use of Attachment Devices to Aid in Adenoma Detection.

Authors:  Zoe Lawrence; Seth A Gross
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 3.  Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jenna L Morgan; Kathryn Thomas; Sarah Braungart; Richard L Nelson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  A new method for screening and surveillance colonoscopy: Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew W Yen; Joseph W Leung; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

5.  Benefits and limitations of cap-fitted colonoscopy in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Naoyuki Kato; Yasuyuki Ichise; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The use of a transparent cap in sigmoidoscopy-A randomized controlled clinical trial on pain, time and success rate.

Authors:  Magnus Ploug; Jacob Kvist Poulsen; Henning Quist Jensen; Michael Achiam
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 7.  Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy to improve caecal intubation.

Authors:  Jenna Morgan; Kathryn Thomas; Heather Lee-Robichaud; Richard L Nelson; Sarah Braungart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

8.  Efficacy of cap-assisted endoscopy for routine examining the ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  Young Rak Choi; Joung-Ho Han; Young Shim Cho; Hye-Suk Han; Hee Bok Chae; Seon Mee Park; Sei Jin Youn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Improved Techniques for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) in Colorectal Adenoma.

Authors:  Moritz Sold; Georg Kähler
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02

Review 10.  Tips and tricks for better endoscopic treatment of colorectal tumors: usefulness of cap and band in colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Seun Ja Park
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.