Literature DB >> 21824317

Clinical diagnosis and outcomes for Troponin T 'positive' patients assessed by a high sensitivity compared with a 4th generation assay.

Sumeshni Jairam1, Peter Jones, Luay Samaraie, Alexei Chataline, James Davidson, Ralph Stewart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) detects lower levels of troponin T with greater precision than the 4th generation (cTnT) assay. However, the clinical implications of this are uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: Primary: Describe the proportion of patients who test 'positive' with hsTnT but negative with cTnT. Secondary: Determine proportion in each group with an adverse event (representation, AMI or died) within 90 days of the index test.
METHOD: 161 patients samples were tested with cTnT and hsTNT assays. McNemar's test was used to compare paired samples. Electronic medical records were reviewed, with discharge diagnosis and 90 day outcomes determined blind to hsTnT results. Patients were then classified as 'TnT negative' (hsTnT was <0.014 mcg/mL), 'new positive' (hsTnT was ≥ 0.014 mcg/mL and cTnT <0.03 mcg/mL) and 'TnT positive' (cTNT was ≥ 0.03 mcg/mL).
RESULTS: Positive results more than doubled with the hsTnT assay (50% vs 22%, P < 0.001). 81 patients were 'TnT negative', 44 were 'new positive' and 36 'cTnT positive'. The discharge diagnosis for 'new positives' was AMI in 4 (9%), other cardiac in 13 (30%) and non-cardiac in 27 (61%). At 90 days adverse events occurred in 30%, 54% and 50% of the groups respectively. There were no late cases of AMI or cardiovascular death in 'new positive' patients.
CONCLUSION: Many patients with diagnoses other than AMI will have hsTNT above the reference level. Indiscriminate testing with hsTnT might lead to more patients requiring serial troponin testing and/or invasive further tests, which will have process and resource implications for EDs and health services.
© 2011 The Authors. EMA © 2011 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21824317     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01446.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic Reclassification by a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assay.

Authors:  Bryn E Mumma; Scott D Casey; Robert K Dang; Michelle K Polen; Jasmanpreet C Kaur; John Rodrigo; Daniel J Tancredi; Robert A Narverud; Ezra A Amsterdam; Nam Tran
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Prevalence, Determinants, and Clinical Associations of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin in Patients Attending Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Kuan Ken Lee; Ala Noaman; Amar Vaswani; Matthew Gibbins; Megan Griffiths; Andrew R Chapman; Fiona Strachan; Atul Anand; David A McAllister; David E Newby; Alasdair J Gray; Nicholas L Mills; Anoop S V Shah
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Patient selection for high sensitivity cardiac troponin testing and diagnosis of myocardial infarction: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anoop S V Shah; Yader Sandoval; Ala Noaman; Anne Sexter; Amar Vaswani; Stephen W Smith; Mathew Gibbins; Megan Griffiths; Andrew R Chapman; Fiona E Strachan; Atul Anand; Martin A Denvir; Philip D Adamson; Michelle S D'Souza; Alasdair J Gray; David A McAllister; David E Newby; Fred S Apple; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-11-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.