D Chen1, J I Tange, B J Meyers, R K Pruthi, W L Nichols, J A Heit. 1. Special Coagulation Laboratory, Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. chen.dong@mayo.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) requires accurate measurement of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate laboratory characteristics, diagnostic accuracy and testing utilities of an automated latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric VWF assay (VWF:Lx) based on a monoclonal antibody recognizing the VWF-platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib binding domain. METHODS: Laboratory characteristics including lower detection limit, linearity, precision, sample stability, and method comparison between VWF:Lx and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity by platelet aggregometry (VWF:RCo) were examined. To assess VWF:Lx diagnostic accuracy, 492 patient plasma samples, including 40 previously characterized VWD patient samples, were tested for VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF:RCo by either aggregometry or flow cytometry, and VWF:Lx with supplemental VWF multimer analysis when indicated. Based on results of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and VWF multimer analysis, and available clinical information, samples were categorized as: normal; VWD types 1, 2A/B, 2M, or severe 1 vs. 2M; or acquired VWF abnormalities (AVWA) due to subtle loss of highest molecular weight multimers. RESULTS: VWF:Lx had excellent laboratory characteristics and linear correlation with VWF:RCo (R(2) = 0.93). VWF:Lx accurately classified virtually all normal and VWD patient samples. Compared with VWF:RCo, VWF:Lx had superior sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing severe type 1 vs. 2M VWD and identifying AVWA. A proposed screening panel comprising VWF:Ag and VWF:Lx had 100% and 83% sensitivity for detecting VWD and AVWA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VWF:Lx has excellent laboratory characteristics and diagnostic accuracy compared with VWF:RCo, and can be used as part of an initial VWD screening panel and as a supplementary test.
BACKGROUND: Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) requires accurate measurement of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate laboratory characteristics, diagnostic accuracy and testing utilities of an automated latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric VWF assay (VWF:Lx) based on a monoclonal antibody recognizing the VWF-platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib binding domain. METHODS: Laboratory characteristics including lower detection limit, linearity, precision, sample stability, and method comparison between VWF:Lx and VWFristocetin cofactor activity by platelet aggregometry (VWF:RCo) were examined. To assess VWF:Lx diagnostic accuracy, 492 patient plasma samples, including 40 previously characterized VWDpatient samples, were tested for VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF:RCo by either aggregometry or flow cytometry, and VWF:Lx with supplemental VWF multimer analysis when indicated. Based on results of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and VWF multimer analysis, and available clinical information, samples were categorized as: normal; VWD types 1, 2A/B, 2M, or severe 1 vs. 2M; or acquired VWF abnormalities (AVWA) due to subtle loss of highest molecular weight multimers. RESULTS:VWF:Lx had excellent laboratory characteristics and linear correlation with VWF:RCo (R(2) = 0.93). VWF:Lx accurately classified virtually all normal and VWDpatient samples. Compared with VWF:RCo, VWF:Lx had superior sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing severe type 1 vs. 2M VWD and identifying AVWA. A proposed screening panel comprising VWF:Ag and VWF:Lx had 100% and 83% sensitivity for detecting VWD and AVWA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:VWF:Lx has excellent laboratory characteristics and diagnostic accuracy compared with VWF:RCo, and can be used as part of an initial VWD screening panel and as a supplementary test.
Authors: Joseph L Blackshear; Ewa M Wysokinska; Robert E Safford; Colleen S Thomas; Mark E Stark; Brian P Shapiro; Steven Ung; Gretchen S Johns; Dong Chen Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-11-17 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Peter J Leary; R Graham Barr; David A Bluemke; Michael R Bristow; Catherine L Hough; Richard A Kronmal; Joao A Lima; Robyn L McClelland; Russell P Tracy; Steven M Kawut Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Mike A Laffan; Will Lester; James S O'Donnell; Andrew Will; Robert Campbell Tait; Anne Goodeve; Carolyn M Millar; David M Keeling Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Paula D James; Nathan T Connell; Barbara Ameer; Jorge Di Paola; Jeroen Eikenboom; Nicolas Giraud; Sandra Haberichter; Vicki Jacobs-Pratt; Barbara Konkle; Claire McLintock; Simon McRae; Robert R Montgomery; James S O'Donnell; Nikole Scappe; Robert Sidonio; Veronica H Flood; Nedaa Husainat; Mohamad A Kalot; Reem A Mustafa Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2021-01-12
Authors: Mohamad A Kalot; Nedaa Husainat; Abdallah El Alayli; Omar Abughanimeh; Osama Diab; Sammy Tayiem; Bader Madoukh; Ahmad B Dimassi; Aref Qureini; Barbara Ameer; Jeroen C J Eikenboom; Nicolas Giraud; Claire McLintock; Simon McRae; Robert R Montgomery; James S O'Donnell; Nikole Scappe; Robert F Sidonio; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Veronica H Flood; Nathan T Connell; Paula D James; Reem A Mustafa Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2022-01-11
Authors: Shannen Deconinck; Claudia Tersteeg; Els Bailleul; Leen Delrue; Nele Vandeputte; Inge Pareyn; Nathalie Itzhar-Baikian; Hans Deckmyn; Simon F De Meyer; Marc Vanderheyden; Karen Vanhoorelbeke Journal: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Date: 2018-10-08