Literature DB >> 21824283

Validation of an automated latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric von Willebrand factor activity assay.

D Chen1, J I Tange, B J Meyers, R K Pruthi, W L Nichols, J A Heit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) requires accurate measurement of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate laboratory characteristics, diagnostic accuracy and testing utilities of an automated latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric VWF assay (VWF:Lx) based on a monoclonal antibody recognizing the VWF-platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib binding domain.
METHODS: Laboratory characteristics including lower detection limit, linearity, precision, sample stability, and method comparison between VWF:Lx and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity by platelet aggregometry (VWF:RCo) were examined. To assess VWF:Lx diagnostic accuracy, 492 patient plasma samples, including 40 previously characterized VWD patient samples, were tested for VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF:RCo by either aggregometry or flow cytometry, and VWF:Lx with supplemental VWF multimer analysis when indicated. Based on results of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo and VWF multimer analysis, and available clinical information, samples were categorized as: normal; VWD types 1, 2A/B, 2M, or severe 1 vs. 2M; or acquired VWF abnormalities (AVWA) due to subtle loss of highest molecular weight multimers.
RESULTS: VWF:Lx had excellent laboratory characteristics and linear correlation with VWF:RCo (R(2) = 0.93). VWF:Lx accurately classified virtually all normal and VWD patient samples. Compared with VWF:RCo, VWF:Lx had superior sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing severe type 1 vs. 2M VWD and identifying AVWA. A proposed screening panel comprising VWF:Ag and VWF:Lx had 100% and 83% sensitivity for detecting VWD and AVWA, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: VWF:Lx has excellent laboratory characteristics and diagnostic accuracy compared with VWF:RCo, and can be used as part of an initial VWD screening panel and as a supplementary test.
© 2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21824283     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04460.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  8 in total

Review 1.  Perils, problems, and progress in laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Veronica H Flood
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.180

2.  Indexes of von Willebrand factor as biomarkers of aortic stenosis severity (from the Biomarkers of Aortic Stenosis Severity [BASS] study).

Authors:  Joseph L Blackshear; Ewa M Wysokinska; Robert E Safford; Colleen S Thomas; Mark E Stark; Brian P Shapiro; Steven Ung; Gretchen S Johns; Dong Chen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Von Willebrand factor and the right ventricle (the MESA-Right Ventricle Study).

Authors:  Peter J Leary; R Graham Barr; David A Bluemke; Michael R Bristow; Catherine L Hough; Richard A Kronmal; Joao A Lima; Robyn L McClelland; Russell P Tracy; Steven M Kawut
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  The diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease: a United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organization guideline approved by the British Committee for Standards in Haematology.

Authors:  Mike A Laffan; Will Lester; James S O'Donnell; Andrew Will; Robert Campbell Tait; Anne Goodeve; Carolyn M Millar; David M Keeling
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.998

5.  ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Paula D James; Nathan T Connell; Barbara Ameer; Jorge Di Paola; Jeroen Eikenboom; Nicolas Giraud; Sandra Haberichter; Vicki Jacobs-Pratt; Barbara Konkle; Claire McLintock; Simon McRae; Robert R Montgomery; James S O'Donnell; Nikole Scappe; Robert Sidonio; Veronica H Flood; Nedaa Husainat; Mohamad A Kalot; Reem A Mustafa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-01-12

6.  De novo mutation and somatic mosaicism of gene mutation in type 2A, 2B and 2M VWD.

Authors:  Ming-Ching Shen; Ming Chen; Gwo-Chin Ma; Shun-Ping Chang; Ching-Yeh Lin; Bo-Do Lin; Han-Ni Hsieh
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2016-10-04

7.  von Willebrand factor levels in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohamad A Kalot; Nedaa Husainat; Abdallah El Alayli; Omar Abughanimeh; Osama Diab; Sammy Tayiem; Bader Madoukh; Ahmad B Dimassi; Aref Qureini; Barbara Ameer; Jeroen C J Eikenboom; Nicolas Giraud; Claire McLintock; Simon McRae; Robert R Montgomery; James S O'Donnell; Nikole Scappe; Robert F Sidonio; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Veronica H Flood; Nathan T Connell; Paula D James; Reem A Mustafa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-01-11

8.  Differences in von Willebrand factor function in type 2A von Willebrand disease and left ventricular assist device-induced acquired von Willebrand syndrome.

Authors:  Shannen Deconinck; Claudia Tersteeg; Els Bailleul; Leen Delrue; Nele Vandeputte; Inge Pareyn; Nathalie Itzhar-Baikian; Hans Deckmyn; Simon F De Meyer; Marc Vanderheyden; Karen Vanhoorelbeke
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-10-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.