Literature DB >> 21824024

Emotional speech processing: disentangling the effects of prosody and semantic cues.

Marc D Pell1, Abhishek Jaywant, Laura Monetta, Sonja A Kotz.   

Abstract

To inform how emotions in speech are implicitly processed and registered in memory, we compared how emotional prosody, emotional semantics, and both cues in tandem prime decisions about conjoined emotional faces. Fifty-two participants rendered facial affect decisions (Pell, 2005a), indicating whether a target face represented an emotion (happiness or sadness) or not (a facial grimace), after passively listening to happy, sad, or neutral prime utterances. Emotional information from primes was conveyed by: (1) prosody only; (2) semantic cues only; or (3) combined prosody and semantic cues. Results indicated that prosody, semantics, and combined prosody-semantic cues facilitate emotional decisions about target faces in an emotion-congruent manner. However, the magnitude of priming did not vary across tasks. Our findings highlight that emotional meanings of prosody and semantic cues are systematically registered during speech processing, but with similar effects on associative knowledge about emotions, which is presumably shared by prosody, semantics, and faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21824024     DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.516915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  15 in total

1.  Effects of Prosodic and Semantic Cues on Facial Emotion Recognition in Relation to Autism-Like Traits.

Authors:  Melina J West; David A Copland; Wendy L Arnott; Nicole L Nelson; Anthony J Angwin
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-08

2.  Semantics-Prosody Stroop Effect on English Emotion Word Processing in Chinese College Students With Trait Depression.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Jing Lian; Gaode Zhang; Chengyu Guo
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Barbra Zupan; Dawn Neumann
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Seeing emotion with your ears: emotional prosody implicitly guides visual attention to faces.

Authors:  Simon Rigoulot; Marc D Pell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  It's not what you say but the way that you say it: an fMRI study of differential lexical and non-lexical prosodic pitch processing.

Authors:  Derek K Tracy; David K Ho; Owen O'Daly; Panayiota Michalopoulou; Lisa C Lloyd; Eleanor Dimond; Kazunori Matsumoto; Sukhwinder S Shergill
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  On the time course of vocal emotion recognition.

Authors:  Marc D Pell; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cultural differences in on-line sensitivity to emotional voices: comparing East and West.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Simon Rigoulot; Marc D Pell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Emotional speech processing at the intersection of prosody and semantics.

Authors:  Rachel Schwartz; Marc D Pell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Her voice lingers on and her memory is strategic: effects of gender on directed forgetting.

Authors:  Hwajin Yang; Sujin Yang; Giho Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inferring emotions from speech prosody: not so easy at age five.

Authors:  Marc Aguert; Virginie Laval; Agnès Lacroix; Sandrine Gil; Ludovic Le Bigot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.