Literature DB >> 21823852

A prospective audit of the quality of documentation of gynaecological operations.

A Oladipo1, L Narang, S Sathiyathasan, Y Hakeem-Habeeb, V Mustaq.   

Abstract

There is a paucity of audits in the speciality of Obstetrics and Gynaecology to estimate the standard of documentation of operation notes. Evidence from several audits across all specialities indicates the overall standard of reporting and documentation in medicine is poor, with many reports failing to contain important and pertinent data. Various attempts have been made to address these shortcomings. To estimate the degree of non-compliance in gynaecological practice, we set out to prospectively audit the standard of documentation of operation notes in a busy District General Hospital serving the largest Borough in terms of population in the city of London. An initial prospective audit was carried out in July 2008; and this was re-audited after 12 months using a standardised proforma based on the Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines. There was evidence of significant improvement with the use of a standardised proforma.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21823852     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.587913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  1 in total

1.  A comparison of mental state examination documentation by junior clinicians in electronic health records before and after the introduction of a semi-structured assessment template (OPCRIT+).

Authors:  Sarah E M Lobo; James Rucker; Madeleine Kerr; Fidel Gallo; Giles Constable; Matthew Hotopf; Robert Stewart; Matthew Broadbent; Martin Baggaley; Simon Lovestone; Peter McGuffin; Myanthi Amarasinghe; Stuart Newman; Gunter Schumann; Philip J Brittain
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.046

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.