Literature DB >> 21823769

The college drinker's check-up: outcomes of two randomized clinical trials of a computer-delivered intervention.

Reid K Hester1, Harold D Delaney, William Campbell.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a computer-delivered intervention (CDI) to reduce heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems in college students in two randomized clinical trials. In Experiment 1, we randomized 144 students to either the CDI or an assessment-only control group with follow-ups at 1 and 12 months. In Experiment 2, we randomized 82 students to either the CDI or a delayed-assessment control group with follow-up at 1 month. In Experiment 1, participants in both groups significantly reduced their drinking at both follow-ups. Compared to the control group, the CDI group reduced their drinking significantly more at 1 and 12 months on three drinking measures at α < .05. Using a more conservative, Bonferroni-adjusted criterion yielded one significant difference in a measure of heavier drinking at the 1 month follow-up. The mean between-groups effect sizes were d = .34 and .36 at 1 and 12 months, respectively. Experiment 2. Compared to the delayed assessment control group, the CDI group significantly reduced (by the Bonferroni-adjusted criterion) their drinking on all consumption measures. These results support the effectiveness of the CDI with heavy drinking college students when used in a clinical setting. In addition, the significant reductions in typical drinking in the control group in Experiment 1 and not in Experiment 2 combined with comparable baseline characteristics suggests that the control group in Experiment 1 demonstrated assessment reactivity. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21823769      PMCID: PMC3246033          DOI: 10.1037/a0024753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  39 in total

Review 1.  Identification, prevention and treatment: a review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students.

Authors:  Mary E Larimer; Jessica M Cronce
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  2002-03

2.  Confidence intervals for effect sizes: compliance and clinical significance in the Journal of Consulting and clinical Psychology.

Authors:  Eric C Odgaard; Robert L Fowler
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2010-06

3.  Screening adolescents for problem drinking: performance of brief screens against DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses.

Authors:  T Chung; S M Colby; N P Barnett; D J Rohsenow; A Spirito; P M Monti
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2000-07

4.  Web-based alcohol prevention for incoming college students: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John T P Hustad; Nancy P Barnett; Brian Borsari; Kristina M Jackson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Michael P Carey; Kelly S DeMartini
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: part I. Alcohol use and related consequences.

Authors:  Patrick R Clifford; Stephen A Maisto; Christine M Davis
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  Development of a Web-based alcohol intervention for university students: processes and challenges.

Authors:  Jonathan Hallett; Bruce Maycock; Kypros Kypri; Peter Howat; Alexandra McManus
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2009-01

8.  Randomized controlled trial of the effects of completing the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test questionnaire on self-reported hazardous drinking.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Maria Day
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  A comparison of alcohol screening instruments among under-aged drinkers treated in emergency departments.

Authors:  Thomas M Kelly; John E Donovan; Janet M Kinnane; David M C D Taylor
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 10.  Focus on: College drinking and related problems: magnitude and prevention of college drinking and related problems.

Authors:  Ralph W Hingson
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2010
View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the psychosocial treatment of addiction: the role of technology in the delivery of evidence-based psychosocial treatment.

Authors:  Lisa A Marsch; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04-11

2.  Computer-assisted behavioral therapy and contingency management for cannabis use disorder.

Authors:  Alan J Budney; Catherine Stanger; J Mick Tilford; Emily B Scherer; Pamela C Brown; Zhongze Li; Zhigang Li; Denise D Walker
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2015-05-04

Review 3.  New developments in behavioral treatments for substance use disorders.

Authors:  Brian D Kiluk; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Smartphone-based, momentary intervention for alcohol cravings amongst individuals with an alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Patrick L Dulin; Vivian M Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2017-07-13

5.  Recruiting U.S. and Canadian college students via social media for participation in a web-based brief intervention study.

Authors:  Tera L Fazzino; Gail L Rose; Scott M Pollack; John E Helzer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 6.  Using e-technologies in clinical trials.

Authors:  Carmen Rosa; Aimee N C Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Meg Brunner; Erin L Winstanley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Efficacy of the College Drinkers Check-Up for Student Drinkers Living Off Campus.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Sara G Balestrieri; Mary Beth Miller; Jennifer E Merrill; Angelo M DiBello; Madeline B Benz
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 8.  Comparative Effectiveness of Brief Alcohol Interventions for College Students: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emily Alden Hennessy; Emily E Tanner-Smith; Dimitris Mavridis; Sean P Grant
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-07

9.  Text messaging interventions for adolescent and young adult substance use: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Mason; Bolanle Ola; Nikola Zaharakis; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-02

Review 10.  Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Patrick R Clifford; Christine M Davis
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.