BACKGROUND: The authors validated the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score in patients with advanced lung, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers who were enrolled on phase 1 trials in the MD Anderson Cancer Center Phase I Clinical Trials Program. METHODS: The RMH score uses albumin (≥3.5 g/dL vs <3.5 g/dL), lactate dehydrogenase (less than or equal to the upper limit of normal [≤ULN] vs >ULN), and the number of metastatic sites (≤2 sites vs ≥3 sites) to predict patient survival in phase 1 trials. The authors of this report retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 229 consecutive patients with lung, pancreatic, and head and neck tumors who were treated on 57 phase 1 trials. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients with lung cancer (N = 85), pancreatic cancer (N = 83), and head and neck tumors (N = 61) were treated. The median patient age was 60 years (range, 26-85 years), and 63% of the patients were men. Patients with a good RMH prognostic score (0-1) at baseline had a longer median survival than patients with a poor prognostic score (2-3; 33.9 weeks vs 21.1 weeks; P < .0001). The RMH score was an independent variable that predicted survival in multivariate analysis. Other independent variables that predicted better survival were hemoglobin level (≥10.5 g/dL), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1), and tumor type. Patients who were treated on first-in-human trials did not fare worse compared with those who were not treated on first-in-human trials. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with lung, pancreatic, and head and neck tumors who were treated on phase 1 trials, survival was predicted accurately by the RMH prognostic score.
BACKGROUND: The authors validated the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score in patients with advanced lung, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers who were enrolled on phase 1 trials in the MD Anderson Cancer Center Phase I Clinical Trials Program. METHODS: The RMH score uses albumin (≥3.5 g/dL vs <3.5 g/dL), lactate dehydrogenase (less than or equal to the upper limit of normal [≤ULN] vs >ULN), and the number of metastatic sites (≤2 sites vs ≥3 sites) to predict patient survival in phase 1 trials. The authors of this report retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 229 consecutive patients with lung, pancreatic, and head and neck tumors who were treated on 57 phase 1 trials. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients with lung cancer (N = 85), pancreatic cancer (N = 83), and head and neck tumors (N = 61) were treated. The median patient age was 60 years (range, 26-85 years), and 63% of the patients were men. Patients with a good RMH prognostic score (0-1) at baseline had a longer median survival than patients with a poor prognostic score (2-3; 33.9 weeks vs 21.1 weeks; P < .0001). The RMH score was an independent variable that predicted survival in multivariate analysis. Other independent variables that predicted better survival were hemoglobin level (≥10.5 g/dL), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1), and tumor type. Patients who were treated on first-in-human trials did not fare worse compared with those who were not treated on first-in-human trials. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with lung, pancreatic, and head and neck tumors who were treated on phase 1 trials, survival was predicted accurately by the RMH prognostic score.
Authors: Seyed Pairawan; Kenneth R Hess; Filip Janku; Nora S Sanchez; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Cathy Eng; Senthilkumar Damodaran; Milind Javle; Ahmed O Kaseb; David S Hong; Vivek Subbiah; Siqing Fu; David R Fogelman; Victoria M Raymond; Richard B Lanman; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Maud H W Starmans; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Georgi Nalbantov; Hugo J W L Aerts; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Paul C Boutros; Pierluigi Granone; Vincenzo Valentini; Adrian C Begg; Dirk De Ruysscher; Andre Dekker Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Prasanth Ganesan; Stacy Moulder; J Jack Lee; Filip Janku; Vicente Valero; Ralph G Zinner; Aung Naing; Siqing Fu; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David Hong; Bettzy Stephen; Philip Stephens; Roman Yelensky; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Razelle Kurzrock; Jennifer J Wheler Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Josep Tabernero; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey R Infante; Sunil R Hingorani; Vinod Ganju; Colin Weekes; Werner Scheithauer; Ramesh K Ramanathan; David Goldstein; Darryl N Penenberg; Alfredo Romano; Stefano Ferrara; Daniel D Von Hoff Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-01-12
Authors: David M Hyman; Anne A Eaton; Mrinal M Gounder; Gary L Smith; Erika G Pamer; Martee L Hensley; David R Spriggs; Percy Ivy; Alexia Iasonos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R Said; J Banchs; J Wheler; K R Hess; G Falchook; S Fu; A Naing; D Hong; S Piha-Paul; Y Ye; E Yeh; R A Wolff; A M Tsimberidou Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Christos Fountzilas; Selena Stuart; Brian Hernandez; Elizabeth Bowhay-Carnes; Joel Michalek; John Sarantopoulos; Anand Karnad; Sukeshi Patel; Steven Weitman; Devalingam Mahalingam Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Winson Y Cheung; Lindsay A Renfro; David Kerr; Aimery de Gramont; Leonard B Saltz; Axel Grothey; Steven R Alberts; Thierry Andre; Katherine A Guthrie; Roberto Labianca; Guido Francini; Jean-Francois Seitz; Chris O'Callaghan; Chris Twelves; Eric Van Cutsem; Daniel G Haller; Greg Yothers; Daniel J Sargent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 44.544