Literature DB >> 21823014

Different optical properties between human hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and non-tumorous hepatic tissues in vitro.

Yuan Yu1, Chaowen Xiao1, Kun Chen1, Jianwei Zheng1, Jun Zhang1, Xinyang Zhao1, Xinbo Xue2.   

Abstract

There has been an ongoing search for clinically acceptable methods for the accurate, efficient and simple diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Optical spectroscopy is a technique with potential clinical applications to diagnose cancer diseases. The purpose of this study was to obtain the optical properties of HCC tissues and non-tumorous hepatic tissues and identify the difference between them. A total of 55 tissue samples (HCC tissue, n=38; non-tumorous hepatic tissue, n=17) were surgically resected from patients with HCC. The optical parameters were measured in 10-nm steps using single-integrating-sphere system in the wavelength range of 400 to 1800 nm. It was found that the optical properties and their differences varied with the wavelength for the HCC tissue and the non-tumorous hepatic tissue in the entire wavelength range of research. The absorption coefficient of the HCC tissue (1.48±0.99, 1.46±0.88, 0.86±0.61, 2.15±0.53, 0.54±0.10, 0.79±0.15 mm(-1)) was significantly lower than that of the non-tumorous hepatic tissue (2.79±1.73, 3.13±1.47, 3.06±2.79, 2.57±0.55, 0.62±0.10, 0.93±0.16 mm(-1)) at wavelengths of 400, 410, 450, 1450, 1660 and 1800 nm, respectively (P<0.05). The reduced scattering coefficient of HCC tissue (5.28±1.70, 4.91±1.54, 1.26±0.35 mm(-1)) and non-tumorous hepatic tissue (8.14±3.70, 9.27±3.08, 2.55±0.57 mm(-1)) was significantly different at 460, 500 and 1800 nm respectively (P<0.05). These results show different pathologic liver tissues have different optical properties. It provides a better understanding of the relationship between optical parameters and physiological characteristics in human liver tissues. And it would be very useful for developing a non-invasive, real-time, simple and efficient way for medical management of HCC in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21823014     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-011-0482-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  36 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F Bray; J Ferlay; P Pisani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Optical biopsy of breast tissue using differential path-length spectroscopy.

Authors:  Robert L P van Veen; Arjen Amelink; Marian Menke-Pluymers; Carmen van der Pol; Henricus J C M Sterenborg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Quantitative physiology of the precancerous cervix in vivo through optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Vivide Tuan-Chyan Chang; Peter S Cartwright; Sarah M Bean; Greg M Palmer; Rex C Bentley; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  Diagnosing breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Zoya Volynskaya; Abigail S Haka; Kate L Bechtel; Maryann Fitzmaurice; Robert Shenk; Nancy Wang; Jon Nazemi; Ramachandra R Dasari; Michael S Feld
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Proteomic analysis of the transitional endoplasmic reticulum in hepatocellular carcinoma: an organelle perspective on cancer.

Authors:  Line Roy; Sylvie Laboissière; Eman Abdou; Geneviève Thibault; Nathalie Hamel; Maryam Taheri; Daniel Boismenu; Joël Lanoix; Robert E Kearney; Jacques Paiement
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-06-04

7.  Model-based analysis of clinical fluorescence spectroscopy for in vivo detection of cervical intraepithelial dysplasia.

Authors:  Sung K Chang; Nena Marin; Michele Follen; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Liver tumor gross margin identification and ablation monitoring during liver radiofrequency treatment.

Authors:  Christopher P Hsu; Mahmood K Razavi; Samuel K So; Ilian H Parachikov; David A Benaron
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Controling the scattering of intralipid by using optical clearing agents.

Authors:  Xiang Wen; Valery V Tuchin; Qingming Luo; Dan Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Model based and empirical spectral analysis for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Changfang Zhu; Tara M Breslin; Josephine Harter; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of human liver tumor specimens - towards a tissue differentiating optical biopsy needle using light emitting diodes.

Authors:  Alina Keller; Piotr Bialecki; Torsten Johannes Wilhelm; Marcus Klaus Vetter
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Enabling in vivo measurements of nanoparticle concentrations with three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Dmitri A Tsyboulski; Anton V Liopo; Richard Su; Sergey A Ermilov; Sergei M Bachilo; R Bruce Weisman; Alexander A Oraevsky
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.207

3.  Annular Fiber Probe for Interstitial Illumination in Photoacoustic Guidance of Radiofrequency Ablation.

Authors:  Hindrik Kruit; Kalloor Joseph Francis; Elina Rascevska; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.