Literature DB >> 21822999

Exploring China's western and central county systems performance measured by outcomes framework scores-a cross-sectional survey of routine healthcare data.

Jun Shi1,2, Liang Zhang1, Yue Liu3, Jiangbo Wang3, Chris Scarf4, Juyang Xiong5.   

Abstract

This study was designed to measure the performance of county health systems in central and western China utilizing routine healthcare data. Drawing on a literature review and expert consultation, the study established a theoretical framework and an indicator system for performance review. Questionnaires were designed and disseminated to collect empirical data on health system performance in four counties of two central and western provinces. Quantitative data were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis through SPSS12.0. Three dimensions were introduced in the performance review framework-health outcomes, financial risk protection and consumer and provider satisfaction. Health outcomes were assessed from four secondary indicators: infant mortality rate; maternal mortality rate; under-5 child mortality rate; and the incidence of Class A and Class B notifiable diseases. Financial risk was assessed using two secondary indicators: the proportion of the cost of inpatient care that was reimbursed under the New Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) insurance scheme, and the rate of NCMS funds utilization. The assessment of satisfaction was made using two secondary indicators: the overall satisfaction of local residents with healthcare services, and the satisfaction of health practitioners at the township and village level. The study indicated better health system performance in the two counties in Chongqing than those in Shanxi. It was concluded that outcome framework scores can fairly reveal performance differences among county health systems in central and western China, and can provide practical evidence for optimizing the operation and inputs of county health systems. Caution needs to be exercised in generalizing such performance outcomes as many factors such as spending and organization that contribute to county health system performance were not included in the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21822999     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-011-0467-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  3 in total

Review 1.  Indigenous health performance measurement systems in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

Authors:  Janet Smylie; Ian Anderson; Mihi Ratima; Sue Crengle; Marcia Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The utilization of systematic outcome mapping to improve performance management in health care.

Authors:  D David Persaud; Lawrence Nestman
Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res       Date:  2006-11

3.  China's health system performance.

Authors:  Yuanli Liu; Keqin Rao; Jing Wu; Emmanuela Gakidou
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  What Contributes to the Activeness of Ethnic Minority Patients with Chronic Illnesses Seeking Allied Health Services? A Cross-Sectional Study in Rural Western China.

Authors:  Shangfeng Tang; Dong Dong; Lu Ji; Hang Fu; Zhanchun Feng; Ghose Bishwajit; Zhifei He; Hui Ming; Qian Fu; Yue Xian
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Health System Outcomes in BRICS Countries and Their Association With the Economic Context.

Authors:  Piotr Romaniuk; Angelika Poznańska; Katarzyna Brukało; Tomasz Holecki
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.