Literature DB >> 21822855

Audiological implications of earplugs used for the prevention of aural exostoses.

Jyoti Srinivasan1, Venkat M Reddy, Phillip M Flanagan.   

Abstract

External auditory canal exostoses may be a preventable disease, so it is surprising that the regular use of water precautions is not greater among surfers. One reason for this is the impairment of hearing whilst wearing earplugs. The objective of this study is to establish the hearing impairment of commonly available earplugs used by surfers. Staff and patients with normal hearing were recruited to have pure tone audiometry performed multiple times, initially with no earplugs, and subsequently with earplugs. Three earplug types were tested which differed in their nature and material (prefabricated elastomer, custom-fitted silicone, and custom-fitted acrylic). Vented and non-vented forms of the earplugs were tested. 30 normal hearing ears were included. Two-tailed paired t-tests comparing hearing thresholds between different earplugs identified that the elastomer earplugs caused the least hearing impairment (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in hearing thresholds between vented and non-vented elastomer earplugs (p = 0.148), but the difference between vented and non-vented forms of other earplugs was statistically significant (silicone p = 0.010, acrylic p = 0.018). Prefabricated ear plugs produce less hearing impairment than other commonly available earplugs. A customised earplug made of hard material causes the greatest impairment of hearing. We therefore recommend that for aquatic sports where hearing is important, a soft prefabricated earplug is preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21822855     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1730-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  Prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses in Australian surfboard riders.

Authors:  William Hurst; Michael Bailey; Benjamin Hurst
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 2.  Health issues for surfers.

Authors:  Todd B Zoltan; Kenneth S Taylor; Suraj A Achar
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  The prevalence of exostoses in the external auditory meatus of surfers.

Authors:  J M Chaplin; I A Stewart
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1998-08

4.  Surfers' awareness of the preventability of 'surfer's ear' and use of water precautions.

Authors:  V M Reddy; T Abdelrahman; A Lau; P M Flanagan
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Exostoses of the external auditory canal in Oregon surfers.

Authors:  F W Deleyiannis; B D Cockcroft; E F Pinczower
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Surfer's ear in Japan.

Authors:  Y Umeda; M Nakajima; H Yoshioka
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Design factors and use of ear protection.

Authors:  C G Rice; R R Coles
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1966-07

8.  Exostoses of the external auditory canal.

Authors:  J R DiBartolomeo
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1979 Nov-Dec

9.  Exostoses of the external auditory canal: a long-term follow-up study of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Ivan Timofeev; Natalia Notkina; Ian M Smith
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2004-12
  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Exostoses of the external auditory canal in professional diving. A case for the German Social Accident Insurance Institution].

Authors:  M Heinmüller; D Nowak; K Stelter
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.284

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.