Literature DB >> 21821619

Results and challenges for the endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms.

Christos Lioupis1, Cherrie Z Abraham.   

Abstract

Endovascular aortic arch reconstruction provides an attractive alternative to treat aortic arch disease in high-risk patients who would otherwise be unsuitable for open repair. Success with multibranched stent grafts in the thoracoabdominal aorta along with recent advances in design such as the precurved inner nitinol cannula have simplified the endovascular reconstruction of aortic arch aneurysms with multibranched stent grafts. These devices allow for greater flexibility in conforming to difficult anatomy and preserving important side branches. During the first surgical stage, a left carotid -subclavian bypass or left subclavian artery transposition is performed. The second stage is the endovascular procedure. The device is inserted through a transfemoral approach, and crossing of the aortic valve with the device is necessary. The stent graft is deployed during brief periods of rapid pacing. Bridging from the branches to the innominate and left common carotid arteries requires a suitable covered stent. In the case of a large-diameter innominate artery, a custom-made bridging limb has to be used to ensure that adequate length and size are available. Direct flow to the innominate and left common carotid arteries do not cease for any significant time during the procedure. Initial experience with mean follow up more than 6 months is encouraging. The method is not suitable for patients with extensive atheromatous involvement of the aortic arch. Careful preoperative planning (preoperative imaging, device construction, and access issues), high endovascular skills, and appropriate imaging equipment are imperative for a successful result. Long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these new devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21821619     DOI: 10.1177/1531003511413608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1521-5768


  6 in total

1.  Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using aortic arch chimney stents in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Igor Voskresensky; Salvatore T Scali; Robert J Feezor; Javairiah Fatima; Kristina A Giles; Rosamaria Tricarico; Scott A Berceli; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Status of branched endovascular aortic arch repair.

Authors:  Theodorus M van Bakel; Hector W de Beaufort; Santi Trimarchi; Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta; Jean Bismuth; Frans L Moll; Himanshu J Patel; Joost A van Herwaarden
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05

3.  Hybrid treatment of penetrating aortic ulcer.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Herrero Lara; Daniela de Araújo Martins-Romêo; Carlos Caparrós Escudero; Rosa María Lepe Vázquez; María Del Carmen Prieto Falcón; Vinicius Bianchi Batista
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2015 May-Jun

4.  Anatomic and hemodynamic investigation of an occluded common carotid chimney stent graft for hybrid thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Rosamaria Tricarico; Yong He; Roger Tran-Son-Tay; Liza Laquian; Adam W Beck; Scott A Berceli
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2019-05-25

5.  Hemodynamic numerical simulation of aortic arch modular inner branched stent-graft in eight early patients from the first-in-human case series.

Authors:  Yating Zhu; Fen Li; Hongpeng Zhang; Hui Song; Xiaodan Ma; Long Cao; Wenjun Zhang; Wei Guo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-30

6.  Anatomic Suitability for Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair in Patients with Aortic Arch Pathological Features.

Authors:  Stefan P M Smorenburg; Matthew Montesano; Tijs J Hoogteijling; Maarten Truijers; Petr Symersky; Evert K Jansen; Harmen R Zandbergen; Willem Wisselink; Theodorus G van Schaik; Kak Khee Yeung
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.