Literature DB >> 21821513

A randomized comparison of intraoperative PerfecTemp and forced-air warming during open abdominal surgery.

Cameron Egan1, Ethan Bernstein, Desigen Reddy, Madi Ali, James Paul, Dongsheng Yang, Daniel I Sessler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The PerfecTemp is an underbody resistive warming system that combines servocontrolled underbody warming with viscoelastic foam pressure relief. Clinical efficacy of the system has yet to be formally evaluated. We therefore tested the hypothesis that intraoperative distal esophageal (core) temperatures with the PerfecTemp (underbody resistive) warming system are noninferior to upper-body forced-air warming in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.
METHODS: Adults scheduled for elective major open abdominal surgery (liver, pancreas, gynecological, and colorectal surgery) under general anesthesia were enrolled at 2 centers. Patients were randomly assigned to underbody resistive or forced-air warming. Resistive heating started when patients were transferred to the operating room table; forced-air warming started after patients were draped. The primary outcome was noninferiority of intraoperative time-weighted average core temperature, adjusted for baseline characteristics and using a buffer of 0.5°C.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to underbody resistive heating and 34 to forced-air warming. Baseline and surgical characteristics were generally similar. We had sufficient evidence (P=0.018) to conclude that underbody resistive warming is not worse than (i.e., noninferior to) upper-body forced-air warming in the time-weighted average intraoperative temperature, with a mean difference of -0.12°C [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37 to 0.14]. Core temperatures at the end of surgery averaged 36.3°C [95% CI 36 to 36.5] in the resistive warming patients and 36.6°C [95% CI 36.4 to 36.8] in those assigned to forced-air warming for a mean difference of -0.34°C [95% CI -0.69 to 0.01].
CONCLUSIONS: Mean intraoperative time-weighted average core temperatures were no different, and significantly noninferior, with underbody resistive heating in comparison with upper-body forced-air warming. Underbody resistive heating may be an alternative to forced-air warming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21821513     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b896d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of forced-air warming systems in prevention of intraoperative hypothermia.

Authors:  Volkan Alparslan; Alparslan Kus; Tulay Hosten; Mehmet Ertargin; Dilek Ozdamar; Kamil Toker; Mine Solak
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Claire Temple-Oberle; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Mark Tan; John L Semple; Christiaan Schrag; Marcio Barreto; Phillip Blondeel; Jeremy Hamming; Joseph Dayan; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.169

3.  Heating and Cooling Rates With an Esophageal Heat Exchange System.

Authors:  Prathima Kalasbail; Natalya Makarova; Frank Garrett; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The effects of a forced-air warming system plus electric blanket for elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Xueli Chen; Yan Xiao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.