OBJECTIVE: The American Board of Surgery now permits general surgery residents to complete their clinical training over a 6-year period. Despite this new policy, the level of interest in flexible scheduling remains undefined. We sought to determine why residents and program directors (PDs) are interested in flexible tracks and to understand implementation barriers. DESIGN: National survey. SETTING: All United States general surgery residency programs that participate in the Association of Program Directors in Surgery listserv. PARTICIPANTS: PDs and categorical general surgery residents in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitudes about flexible tracks in surgery training. A flexible track was defined as a schedule that allows residents to pursue nonclinical time during residency with resulting delay in residency completion. RESULTS: Of the 748 residents and 81 PDs who responded, 505 residents and 45 PDs were supportive of flexible tracks (68% vs 56%, p = 0.03). Residents and PDs both were interested in flexible tracks to pursue research (86% vs 82%, p = 0.47) and child bearing (69% vs 58%, p = 0.13), but residents were more interested in pursuing international work (74% vs 53%, p = 0.004) and child rearing (63% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Although 71% of residents believe that flexible-track residents would not be respected as the equal of other residents, only 17% of PDs indicated they would not respect flexible-track residents (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most residents and PDs support flexible tracks, although they differ in their motivation and perceived barriers. This finding lends support to the new policy of the American Board of Surgery.
OBJECTIVE: The American Board of Surgery now permits general surgery residents to complete their clinical training over a 6-year period. Despite this new policy, the level of interest in flexible scheduling remains undefined. We sought to determine why residents and program directors (PDs) are interested in flexible tracks and to understand implementation barriers. DESIGN: National survey. SETTING: All United States general surgery residency programs that participate in the Association of Program Directors in Surgery listserv. PARTICIPANTS: PDs and categorical general surgery residents in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitudes about flexible tracks in surgery training. A flexible track was defined as a schedule that allows residents to pursue nonclinical time during residency with resulting delay in residency completion. RESULTS: Of the 748 residents and 81 PDs who responded, 505 residents and 45 PDs were supportive of flexible tracks (68% vs 56%, p = 0.03). Residents and PDs both were interested in flexible tracks to pursue research (86% vs 82%, p = 0.47) and child bearing (69% vs 58%, p = 0.13), but residents were more interested in pursuing international work (74% vs 53%, p = 0.004) and child rearing (63% vs 44%, p = 0.02). Although 71% of residents believe that flexible-track residents would not be respected as the equal of other residents, only 17% of PDs indicated they would not respect flexible-track residents (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most residents and PDs support flexible tracks, although they differ in their motivation and perceived barriers. This finding lends support to the new policy of the American Board of Surgery.
Authors: Erika L Rangel; Douglas S Smink; Manuel Castillo-Angeles; Gifty Kwakye; Marguerite Changala; Adil H Haider; Gerard M Doherty Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Erika L Rangel; Heather Lyu; Adil H Haider; Manuel Castillo-Angeles; Gerard M Doherty; Douglas S Smink Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 14.766