Literature DB >> 21821211

Do strong resident teachers help medical students on objective examinations of knowledge?

Sean J Langenfeld1, Stephen D Helmer, Therese E Cusick, R Stephen Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a lack of formal training, surgical residents at our institution have an integral role instructing medical students on their general surgery clerkship. It is unknown how the instruction provided by surgical residents affects the students' testable knowledge base and performance on standardized surgical examinations. The purpose of this survey study was to evaluate the impact of surgical resident teachers on medical student performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners surgery shelf examination. STUDY
DESIGN: Surveys were provided to all third-year medical students completing an 8-week clerkship in general surgery. Students were asked to rate the quality and quantity of instruction received from surgical residents. Resident instruction was evaluated in several categories using a 5-point Likert scale. Analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of survey responses on student percentile scores on the surgery shelf examination.
RESULTS: Seventy-five of 110 (67.3%) students completed the surveys over a period of 22 months. Forty-two individual residents were evaluated in several categories, and an overall teaching evaluation was completed. The mean shelf percentile score by the medical students was 48.1 ± 31.4 (range, 1st to 98th percentile). Using univariate analyses, no individual resident factors or overall factors had a significant effect on student performance. A regression analysis revealed that overall quality of instruction had a significantly positive impact on student performance (p = 0.038). Individual residents and increasing PGY level had a significantly negative impact on the students' shelf performance (p < 0.001). The model R(2) showed our model to predict only 13.8% of the student's examination score variability.
CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant relationship exists between student performance on the shelf examination and their perception of the overall quality of instruction that they receive from surgical residents. However, this seems to account only for a small portion of the variability in student percentile scores.
Copyright © 2011 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21821211     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  5 in total

Review 1.  Creating a surgery clerkship in a changing environment: reality, simulation, and the rules of engagement.

Authors:  Leigh V Evans; Richard J Gusberg
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2012-03-29

Review 2.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13

3.  Does how much a resident teaches impact performance? A comparison of preclinical teaching hours to pathology residents' in-service examination scores.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Talmon; Donna K Czarnecki; Harlan R Sayles
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-04-20

4.  Core components of clinical education: a qualitative study with attending physicians and their residents.

Authors:  Alireza Esteghamati; Hamidreza Baradaran; Alireza Monajemi; Hamid Reza Khankeh; Mehrnaz Geranmayeh
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2016-04

5.  Medical student and resident perceptions when working together in resident continuity clinics.

Authors:  Tina Chaalan; Deborah Landis Lewis; Kelly O'Connor; Bryan Popp; Maya Hammoud; Erika L Mowers
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2020-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.