STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Pouring time of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions differs depending on the brand and intended use, either of which may result in variable dimensional stability. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the available literature on dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials as a function of pouring time and disinfectant solutions used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three electronic database searches (Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE) were conducted to identify in vitro peer-reviewed studies published in English between the early 1970s and October 2010. Selection criteria included in vitro studies, irreversible hydrocolloid as impression material, and storage time. Heterogeneity in the methodology of the selected studies precluded a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 62 initially selected studies only 18 were included. Traditional irreversible hydrocolloids were generally stable when poured immediately. However, stability decreased as time elapsed. New irreversible hydrocolloid substitutes appear to allow delay in pouring time and repouring of impressions without significant side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter storage time of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions before pouring is desirable, although this may not be necessary for the extended-pour types. The lack of a standardized technique for studying the effect of storage condition, with or without the use of disinfectants, makes it difficult to make clear recommendations.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Pouring time of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions differs depending on the brand and intended use, either of which may result in variable dimensional stability. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the available literature on dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials as a function of pouring time and disinfectant solutions used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three electronic database searches (Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE) were conducted to identify in vitro peer-reviewed studies published in English between the early 1970s and October 2010. Selection criteria included in vitro studies, irreversible hydrocolloid as impression material, and storage time. Heterogeneity in the methodology of the selected studies precluded a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 62 initially selected studies only 18 were included. Traditional irreversible hydrocolloids were generally stable when poured immediately. However, stability decreased as time elapsed. New irreversible hydrocolloid substitutes appear to allow delay in pouring time and repouring of impressions without significant side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter storage time of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions before pouring is desirable, although this may not be necessary for the extended-pour types. The lack of a standardized technique for studying the effect of storage condition, with or without the use of disinfectants, makes it difficult to make clear recommendations.
Authors: Alessandra Impellizzeri; Martina Horodynski; Adriana De Stefano; Gaspare Palaia; Antonella Polimeni; Umberto Romeo; Elisabeth Guercio-Monaco; Gabriella Galluccio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 3.390