Literature DB >> 21820794

What is the learning curve for single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy?

Taejong Song1, Tae-Joong Kim, Yoo-Young Lee, Chel Hun Choi, Jeong-Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk-Soo Bae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Single-port access (SPA) surgery is a rapidly advancing technique in laparoscopic surgery. Currently, there is limited evidence on the learning curve and complications of performing SPA laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies (LAVHs). STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred patients who initially planned to undergo a SPA-LAVH for benign indications between May 2008 and October 2009 were enrolled. All operative data were prospectively collected. Patients were arranged in order based on the date of surgery and the outcomes were compared between quartiles (cases 1-25, 26-50, 51-75, and 76-100). Proficiency was defined as the point at which the slope of the curve becomes less steep for operative time. Plateau was defined as the point at which the slope is zero. A comparison of the data on a quartile was performed. Locally weighted regression generated smoothed lines that represent operative time over the sequence of the operations.
RESULTS: Most SPA-LAVHs were successful, but additional ports were needed in 5 patients because of pelvic adhesions (n=3) and large uterine size (n=2). There were 3 cases with post-operative complications (hemorrhage, 1; vesicovaginal fistula, 1; and cuff abscess, 1), who were managed without sequelae. Without increased operative morbidities, the operative time decreased from a median of 133.0 min (interquartile range, 107.5-162.5 min) in the first quartile to a median of 100.0 min (interquartile range, 85.0-117.5 min) for the last quartile (p=0.011). The proficiency and plateau were determined after approximately 25 and 75 cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The SPA-LAVH was safe, effective, and reproducible after training, and with the current technique, had a low rate of complications.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21820794     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  4 in total

1.  Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor.

Authors:  Jun-Hyeok Kang; Joseph J Noh; Soo Young Jeong; Jung In Shim; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Hyun-Soo Kim; Tae-Joong Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for benign or pre-invasive uterine disease.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Juhee Nho; In-Ji Cho; Yuran Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: our initial experiences with 100 cases.

Authors:  Young-Sam Choi; Kwang-Sik Shin; Jin Choi; Ji-No Park; Yun-Sang Oh; Tae-Eel Rhee
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-09-04

4.  Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Elise Bardawil; Robert K Zurawin; Junwei Wu; Huaying Fu; Francisco Orejuela; Xiaoming Guan
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.