Literature DB >> 21820644

Left circumflex occlusion in acute myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry).

W Kyle Stribling1, Michael C Kontos, Antonio Abbate, Richard Cooke, George W Vetrovec, David Dai, Emily Honeycutt, Tracy Y Wang, Kapildeo Lotun.   

Abstract

Compared to occlusions of other major coronary arteries, patients presenting with acute left circumflex (LCx) occlusion usually have ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram <50% of the time, potentially delaying treatment and resulting in worse outcomes. In contemporary practice, little is known about the clinical outcomes of patients with LCx territory occlusion without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We identified patients with myocardial infarction from April 2004 to June 2009 in the CathPCI Registry treated with percutaneous coronary intervention for culprit LCx territory occlusion, excluding those with previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Logistic generalized estimating equation modeling was used to compare the outcomes, including in-hospital mortality between patients with STEMI and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) adjusting for differences in the baseline characteristics. Of the 27,711 patients with myocardial infarction and acute LCx territory occlusion, 18,548 (67%) presented with STEMI and 9,163 (33%) with NSTEMI. With the exception of a greater proportion of cardiac risk factors and cardiac history in the NSTEMI group, the demographic and baseline characteristics were clinically similar between the 2 groups, despite the statistical significance resulting from the large population. The patients with STEMI were more likely to have a proximal LCx culprit lesion (63% vs 27%, p <0.0001) and had greater risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.65, p = 0.002) compared to patients with NSTEMI. In conclusion, acute LCx territory occlusion often presents as NSTEMI, but patients with NSTEMI and occlusion have a lower mortality risk than those with STEMI, possibly because of factors such as the amount of myocardium involved, the lesion location along the vessel, and/or a dual blood supply.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21820644     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Characterizing preclinical model of ischemic heart failure: difference between LAD and LCx infarctions.

Authors:  Michael G Katz; Anthony S Fargnoli; Andrew P Kendle; Charles R Bridges
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction with "N" wave on electrocardiogram and culprit vessel in left circumflex has a risk equivalent to ST-elevated myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tiangui Yang; Jie Chen; Xiaoxia Liu; Changlu Xu; Tiesheng Niu; Xi Fu; Peng Fu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Case report: Posterior myocardial infarction in presence of right bundle branch block: an old concept with new findings.

Authors:  José Antonio Cornejo-Guerra; Daniel Manzur-Sandoval; José Fernando Guadalajara-Boo; José Luis Briseño-de la Cruz
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.