Literature DB >> 21820483

A qualitative and quantitative investigation into the effect of fluoride formulations on enamel erosion and erosion-abrasion in vitro.

R S Austin1, K S Stenhagen, L H Hove, S Dunne, R Moazzez, D W Bartlett, A B Tveit.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of a single application of highly concentrated SnF(2) and NaF solutions and a NaF/CaF(2) varnish on human enamel subjected to hydrochloric acid erosion and tooth brush abrasion.
METHODS: Forty enamel samples were prepared from human third molars and NaF (9500ppm, pH 8.0), SnF(2) (9500ppm, pH 2.6) solutions; Bifluorid10(®) varnish (42,500ppm, NaF 5%, CaF(2) 5%) and deionized water (control) was applied to the enamel. Following this three, six and nine cycles of erosion [1 cycle=erosion (0.01M HCl, pH 2.2, 2min)+artificial saliva (1h, pH 7.0)] and erosion-abrasion [1 cycle=erosion (0.01M HCl, pH 2.2, 2min)+artificial saliva (1h, pH 7.0)+abrasion (120 linear strokes in artificial saliva from Tepe medium soft brushes 200g loading)] were carried out. The fluoride treated enamel was analysed using Knoop microhardness, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).
RESULTS: For erosion alone, there was significantly less microhardness reduction in the Bifluorid10(®) group after three and six cycles of erosion (P<0.05), however no other groups showed statistically different hardness (P>0.05). The EDS analysis showed that only the Bifluorid10(®) group had any detectable fluorine following erosion and erosion-abrasion (0.1wt.% and 0.2wt.% fluorine respectively). The surface fluorine was found to have been removed after erosion and erosion-abrasion for all other surface treatments. Although precipitates were observed after application of the surface treatments, following erosion-abrasion, no visible surface effects from any fluoride preparation remained.
CONCLUSIONS: Enamel surface precipitates from application NaF, SnF(2) solutions appear to not be able to provide protection against gastric erosion and tooth brush abrasion. The NaF/CaF(2) varnish provided limited protection against erosion but the role for such varnishes in gastric erosion and tooth brush abrasion remains uncertain.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21820483     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  5 in total

1.  Protective effects of SnF2 - Part II. Deposition and retention on pellicle-coated enamel.

Authors:  Deepa Khambe; Sandra L Eversole; Timothy Mills; Robert V Faller
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.607

2.  Measurement of surface roughness changes of unpolished and polished enamel following erosion.

Authors:  Francesca Mullan; Rupert S Austin; Charles R Parkinson; Adam Hasan; David W Bartlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of surface protection on the permeability of eroded dentin.

Authors:  Vivian Leite Martins; Rodrigo Vitoria da Costa Ramos; Max José Pimenta Lima; Roberto Paulo Correia de Araújo; Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

4.  Morpho-Chemical Observations of Human Deciduous Teeth Enamel in Response to Biomimetic Toothpastes Treatment.

Authors:  Maurizio Bossù; Roberto Matassa; Michela Relucenti; Flavia Iaculli; Alessandro Salucci; Gianni Di Giorgio; Giuseppe Familiari; Antonella Polimeni; Stefano Di Carlo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Effect of Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Coupled with Resin-Containing and Xylitol-Containing Fluoride Varnishes on Enamel Erosion.

Authors:  Zahra Khoubrouypak; Mahdi Abbasi; Elham Ahmadi; Niyousha Rafeie; Marjan Behroozibakhsh
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.