Literature DB >> 21820368

Fat, muscles, and wages.

Christiane Bozoyan1, Tobias Wolbring.   

Abstract

Recent studies in health economics have generated two important findings: that as a measure of fatness the body mass index (BMI) is biased; and that, when it comes to analyzing wage correlates, both fat-free mass (FFM) and body fat (BF) are better suited to the task. We validate these findings for Germany using the BIAdata Base Project and the German Socio-Economic Panel. While we find no significant correlation between BMI and wages in any of our models, simple linear regression models featuring both contemporary and time-lagged fatness measures indicate that FFM and, to a lesser extent, BF are associated with hourly wages: more specifically, the relationship between FFM/BF and hourly wages is about two to three times higher for females than for males. In contrast, fixed-effects models indicate that there is no correlation between hourly wages and both FFM and BF with one exception: a significant correlation (and one in line with expectations) is found to be the rule among job changers. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21820368     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2011.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  3 in total

1.  Waist circumference, body mass index, and employment outcomes.

Authors:  Jonas Minet Kinge
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-10-11

2.  Productivity or discrimination? An economic analysis of excess-weight penalty in the Swedish labor market.

Authors:  Margareta Dackehag; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Martin Nordin
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-06-06

3.  Alternative measures of body composition and wage premium: New evidence from Indonesia.

Authors:  Md Nazmul Ahsan; Petri Böckerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.