Literature DB >> 21819752

Comparison study between MAST CLA and OPTIGEN.

Jin Kook Kim1, Yeo-Min Yoon, Won-Jong Jang, Yeon-Joo Choi, Seok-Chan Hong, Jae Hoon Cho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The MAST-CLA system (Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics, Inc., Mountain View, CA) is an in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous determination of specific IgE to different allergens. Recently, a new generation of MAST-CLA was developed (OPTIGEN; Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics). The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of these two tests for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.
METHODS: Suspicious allergic rhinitis patients were divided into four groups and their medical records were reviewed: group 1 patients were tested with the MAST-CLA and skin-prick tests (251 patients), group 2 patients were tested with the OPTIGEN and skin-prick tests (319 patients), group 3 patients were tested with the MAST-CLA and CAP (104 patients) tests, and group 4 patients were tested with the OPTIGEN and CAP tests (270 patients). The correlation between MAST-CLA and OPTIGEN to skin-prick and CAP tests was determined.
RESULTS: The positivity percentage of MAST-CLA results was higher than with skin-prick and CAP tests, and the results for the OPTIGEN test were comparable with skin-prick test and CAP. This suggests that the MAST-CLA test might have a slightly higher rate of giving false positive results. The OPTIGEN test correlated better with the skin-prick test and CAP.
CONCLUSION: The OPTIGEN test performed better than the MAST-CLA test for diagnosing allergic rhinitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21819752     DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  5 in total

1.  Dysbiosis of Inferior Turbinate Microbiota Is Associated with High Total IgE Levels in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis.

Authors:  Dong-Wook Hyun; Hyun Jin Min; Min-Soo Kim; Tae Woong Whon; Na-Ri Shin; Pil Soo Kim; Hyun Sik Kim; June Young Lee; Woorim Kang; Augustine M K Choi; Joo-Heon Yoon; Jin-Woo Bae
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 2.  Point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases: From methods to devices.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Mei Liu; Zhifei Wang; Song Li; Yan Deng; Nongyue He
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 20.722

3.  Comparison of the ImmunoCAP Assay and AdvanSure™ AlloScreen Advanced Multiplex Specific IgE Detection Assay.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Park; Jongsun Lee; Sang Chul Lee; Young Woong Son; Da Woon Sim; Jae Hyun Lee; Jung Won Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Comparison of three multiple allergen simultaneous tests: RIDA allergy screen, MAST optigen, and polycheck allergy.

Authors:  Minje Han; Sue Shin; Hyewon Park; Kyoung Un Park; Myoung Hee Park; Eun Young Song
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection.

Authors:  Izabela Szymczak-Pajor; Rafal Pawliczak
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.837

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.