Literature DB >> 21819750

The Candy Smell Test in clinical routine.

Boris R Haxel1, Shannon Bertz-Duffy, Andreas Faldum, Sokrates Trellakis, Bernhard Stein, Bertold Renner, Gerd Kobal, Stephan Letzel, Wolf J Mann, Axel Muttray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The "Candy Smell Test" (CST) has been introduced as a new testing method for the evaluation of the human sense of smell. In contrast to other established orthonasal smell tests, the CST addresses the retronasal application of odors, typical for food aroma effects during mastication and swallowing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the CST in a clinical setting in patients with olfactory dysfunction and normal controls against the Sniffin' Sticks test. Furthermore, cutoff points for normal and pathological results in the CST should be determined.
METHODS: The olfactory performance of 96 patients presenting with olfactory disorders and 71 healthy controls was evaluated with the CST-comprised of 23 different aromatized smell candies and the extended Sniffin' Sticks test (threshold, discrimination, and identification). The control group was gender matched but included also younger persons.
RESULTS: The tested subjects could easily understand the procedures and were motivated to participate. The CST correlated well with the Sniffin' Sticks for all tested subjects and for patients (n = 96) and controls (n = 71). The proposed cutoff value to differentiate normosmia from hyposmia in the CST was a score of <16 (i.e., 16 correctly identified odors) of 23. A score below 13 in the CST was the cutoff value for anosmia.
CONCLUSION: The CST is an easy-to-handle reliable tool to investigate retronasal olfaction suited for clinical determination of normosmia, hyposmia, and ansomia. In addition, it can be used for investigation where self-application is necessary such as in large survey studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21819750     DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  12 in total

1.  Retronasal testing of olfactory function: an investigation and comparison in seven countries.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Heike Hoffmann; Carl Philpott; Philippe Rombaux; Antje Welge-Luessen; Jan Vodicka; Iordanis Konstantinidis; Eduardo Morera; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Retronasal Olfaction Test Methods: A Systematic Review

Authors:  Hüseyin Özay; Aslı Çakır; Mustafa Cenk Ecevit
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.021

3.  Body-Mass-Index Associated Differences in Ortho- and Retronasal Olfactory Function and the Individual Significance of Olfaction in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Gerold Besser; Brigitte Erlacher; Kadriye Aydinkoc-Tuzcu; David T Liu; Eleonore Pablik; Verena Niebauer; Martin Koenighofer; Bertold Renner; Christian A Mueller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification.

Authors:  Ayaho Yoshino; Robert Pellegrino; Curtis R Luckett; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  q-Powders: a quick test for screening retronasal olfactory disorders with tasteless powders.

Authors:  Michal Pieniak; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Marie Klockow; Ayaho Yoshino; Antje Haehner; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  A systematic-review of olfactory deficits in neurodevelopmental disorders: From mouse to human.

Authors:  Ariel M Lyons-Warren; Isabella Herman; Patrick J Hunt; Benjamin R Arenkiel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 9.052

7.  Reversible obstruction of the olfactory cleft: impact on olfactory perception and nasal patency.

Authors:  Gerold Besser; David T Liu; Bertold Renner; Thomas Hummel; Christian A Mueller
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.858

8.  Flavor education and training in olfactory dysfunction: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gerold Besser; Michaela M Oswald; David T Liu; Bertold Renner; Christian A Mueller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Ortho- and retronasal olfactory performance in rhinosurgical procedures: a longitudinal comparative study.

Authors:  Gerold Besser; David T Liu; Gunjan Sharma; Tina J Bartosik; Sebastian Kaphle; Max Enßlin; Bertold Renner; Christian A Mueller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Diagnosis of Anosmia and Hyposmia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdul K Saltagi; Mohamad Z Saltagi; Amit K Nag; Arthur W Wu; Thomas S Higgins; Anna Knisely; Jonathan Y Ting; Elisa A Illing
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.