Literature DB >> 21819434

The influence of atrial and ventricular pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Lior U Elkayam1, Jodi L Koehler, Todd J Sheldon, Taya V Glotzer, Lawrence S Rosenthal, Gervasio A Lamas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of atrial pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. Furthermore, the threshold of ventricular pacing that is associated with a higher incidence of AF has yet to be determined. Thus, we set out to determine the optimal pacing modality in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) for the prevention of AF.
METHODS: Individual patient data from four contemporary pacemaker studies were gathered and analyzed. Since AF would inherently lead to a reduction in atrial pacing, percent atrial and ventricular pacing (%AP and %VP) were determined at the first follow-up visit and then used as a surrogate for all endpoints. Patients with >5 minutes of AF at the first visit were excluded. The primary endpoint was defined as 7 consecutive days of AF.
RESULTS: A total of 1,507 patients were included. During a mean follow-up of 14.3 ± 8.7 months, 77 patients developed AF (annual rate of 4.3%). The incidence of AF in the first (0-32%), second (32-66%), third (66-89%), and fourth (89-100%) quartiles of %AP was 1.3%, 5.3%, 5.8%, and 8.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). A multivariable analysis found that pacing above the first quartile was associated with a relative risk of 2.93 (95% confidence interval 1.16-7.39, P = 0.023). The grouping of %VP into first (0-2%), second (2-7%), third (7-84%), and fourth (84-100%) quartiles yielded an AF incidence of 2.4%, 3.4%, 6.6%, and 8.0%, respectively (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that in patients with SND both atrial and ventricular pacing are associated with a higher incidence of AF. ©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21819434     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

Review 1.  Heart Rhythm Society: expert consensus statements-part 1.

Authors:  Susie Sennhauser; Rishi Anand; Fred Kusumoto; Nora Goldschlager
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Prevalence and predictors of atrial arrhythmias in patients with sinus node dysfunction and atrial pacing.

Authors:  Abdallah Bukari; Eisha Wali; Amrish Deshmukh; Zaid Aziz; Michael Broman; Andrew Beaser; Gaurav Upadhyay; Hemal Nayak; Roderick Tung; Cevher Ozcan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Impact of high-grade atrioventricular block and cumulative frequent pacing on atrial arrhythmias.

Authors:  Eisha Wali; Amrish Deshmukh; Abdallah Bukari; Michael Broman; Zaid Aziz; Andrew Beaser; Gaurav Upadhyay; Hemal M Nayak; Roderick Tung; Cevher Ozcan
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  The Mechanical Cost of Decreasing Conduction Velocity: A Mathematical Model of Pacing-Induced Lower Strain.

Authors:  Ibrahim Marai; David Carasso; Shaqed Carasso; Shemy Carasso
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Analyses of risk factors and prognosis for new-onset atrial fibrillation in elderly patients after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Chen; Xue-Jun Ren; Zhuo Liang; Zhi-Hong Han; Tao Zhang; Zhi Luo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Predictors and long-term clinical outcomes of newly developed atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Bum Sung Kim; Kwang Jin Chun; Jin Kyung Hwang; Seung-Jung Park; Kyoung-Min Park; June Soo Kim; Young Keun On
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.