Literature DB >> 21819316

Preservation of residual renal function with limited water removal in hemodialysis patients.

Zongli Diao1, Dongliang Zhang, Wendi Dai, Jiaxiang Ding, Aihua Zhang, Wenhu Liu.   

Abstract

Residual renal function (RRF) is of paramount importance for hemodialysis (HD) adequacy, morbidity, and mortality. Some studies have shown that overhydration is beneficial for preservation of RRF, but it can also increase the probability of adverse events such as hypertension and heart failure in HD patients. To determine the optimal amount of dehydration, we performed HD with limited water removal in HD patients. Eighteen HD patients included in this self-controlled study underwent HD with limited water removal. Water removal volume was determined by a previous volume as follows. Total water removal volume was divided into levels: ≤3.0, 3.0-9.0, and >9.0 L per week. Water removal was performed to obtain dry weight in the last dialysis, and was performed three times with a ratio of 1:1:2 and 2:2:3, respectively. Urine volume, endogenous creatinine clearance rate, Kt/V, hemoglobin, and serum albumin were recorded before and after the study at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The follow-up period was 12 months. Ten patients withdrew from the study because of adverse events including hypertension (n = 3), heart failure (n = 3), angina (n = 1), polycystic kidney rupture (n = 1), obvious edema (n = 1), and one patient had too much interdialytic weight gain to continue. As a result, we stopped this study after 1 month. Our data suggest that the preservation of RRF with limited water removal in HD patients must be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21819316     DOI: 10.3109/0886022X.2011.605535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ren Fail        ISSN: 0886-022X            Impact factor:   2.606


  7 in total

Review 1.  Twice-weekly and incremental hemodialysis treatment for initiation of kidney replacement therapy.

Authors:  Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Mark Unruh; Philip G Zager; Csaba P Kovesdy; Joanne M Bargman; Jing Chen; Suresh Sankarasubbaiyan; Gaurang Shah; Thomas Golper; Richard A Sherman; David S Goldfarb
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Gradual initiation of dialysis as a means to reduce cost while providing quality health care.

Authors:  Mohamed E Elrggal; Rowan Zyada
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Incremental Hemodialysis: The University of California Irvine Experience.

Authors:  Mehrdad Ghahremani-Ghajar; Vanessa Rojas-Bautista; Wei-Ling Lau; Madeleine Pahl; Miguel Hernandez; Anna Jin; Uttam Reddy; Jason Chou; Yoshitsugu Obi; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Connie M Rhee
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Preservation of residual renal function by not removing water in new hemodialysis patients: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Sha Liu; Zongli Diao; Dongliang Zhang; Jiaxiang Ding; Wenying Cui; Wenhu Liu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  What Is Known and Unknown About Twice-Weekly Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Obi; Rieko Eriguchi; Shuo-Ming Ou; Connie M Rhee; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Influence of dry weight reduction on anemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yinghui Deng; Hua Liu; Na Lin; Lina Ma; Wenjing Fu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Effect of frequent hemodialysis on residual kidney function.

Authors:  John T Daugirdas; Tom Greene; Michael V Rocco; George A Kaysen; Thomas A Depner; Nathan W Levin; Glenn M Chertow; Daniel B Ornt; Jochen G Raimann; Brett Larive; Alan S Kliger
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 10.612

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.