| Literature DB >> 21818059 |
Nahí Adriana Guerra-Navarro1, Laura Nadxieli Palacios-Grijalva, Deyanira Angeles-Beltrán, Guillermo E Negrón-Silva, Leticia Lomas-Romero, Eduardo González-Zamora, Rubén Gaviño-Ramírez, Juan Navarrete-Bolaños.
Abstract
A comparison was made of the effectiveness of the functionalization reactions of pentacyclo[5.4.0.0(2,6).0(3,10).0(5,9)]undecane-8,11-dione (PCU) using sulphated zirconia in protection-deprotection reactions and Mg/Al hydrotalcite in a cyanosilylation reaction, under classical thermal conditions and imposing microwave radiation; improved yields and reaction times were considered.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21818059 PMCID: PMC6264255 DOI: 10.3390/molecules16086561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1PCU protection, cyanosilylation and deprotection reactions.
Figure 2Diffractogram of the sulphated zirconia.
Figure 3Nitrogen adsorption-desorption plot of sulphated zirconia.
Figure 4Diffractogram of HTs.
Figure 5Diffractogram of HTc.
Hydrotalcites’ textural properties.
| Catalyst | Surface area (SBET) (m2/g) | Pore Volume (cc/g) | Pore diameter (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hts | 66.62 | 0.44 | 266.88 |
| Htc | 241.21 | 0.74 | 159.70 |
Figure 6Nitrogen adsorption-desorption plot of HTs.
Figure 7Nitrogen adsorption-desorption plot of HTc.
Figure 8TGA and DTA profiles of HTs.
Figure 9TGA and DTA profiles of sulphated zirconia.
Figure 10Deconvolution plot of the carbonates zone FT-IR spectra of as-synthezised hydrotalcite.
Figure 11Deconvolution plot of carbonates zone FT-IR spectra of calcined hydrotalcite.
Scheme 1Protection reaction.
Scheme 2Cyanosilylation reaction.
Scheme 3Deprotection reaction.
Catalytic activity results.
| Substrate | Time(h) | Product | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.75 a | 99.8 a | ||
| 5.00 c | 88.8 c | ||
| 6.00 e | 90.1 e |
Reaction conditions: (a) PCU (1.15 mmol), ethylene glycol (1.15 mmol), toluene (1 mL), ZrO2/SO4−2 (25 mg), 80 °C; (b) PCU (1 mmol), ethylene glycol (1 mL), solventless, ZrO2/SO4−2 (25 mg), 150 °C, 290 Watts; (c) Pentacyclic [5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undecane-8,11-dione monoethylene-acetal (2 mmol), TMSCN (2 mmol), solventless, calcined hydrotalcite (25 mg), 0 °C; (d) Pentacyclic [5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9] undecane-8,11-dione monoethylene-acetal (2 mmol), TMSCN (2 mmol), solventless, calcined hydrotalcite (25 mg), 0 °C, 290 Watts; (e) Pentacyclic [5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undecane-8,11-dione monoethylene-acetal cyanosilylated (1 mmol), acetonitrile (1 mL), ZrO2/SO4−2 (25 mg), 60 °C; Pentacyclic [5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undecane-8,11-dione monoethylene-acetal cyanosilylated (1 mmol), acetonitrile (1 mL), ZrO2/SO4−2 (25 mg), were irradiated at 60 °C, 20 min, 100 Watts.