Literature DB >> 21817143

Effect of dose and combination of antihypertensives on interindividual blood pressure variability: a systematic review.

Alastair John Stewart Webb1, Peter Malcolm Rothwell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Recent studies have shown that visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is a powerful risk factor for stroke, is reduced by calcium channel blockers and diuretics, and increased by β-blockers. However, it is unknown whether these effects are dose-dependent and persist in combination with other drugs.
METHODS: Cochrane and Medline databases were searched for systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials of antihypertensive drugs. Eligible trials randomized all patients to a combination of drug classes or different doses of the same drug. Baseline and follow-up data for mean (SD) systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure were extracted. Differences in interindividual variance (SD2) in blood pressure were expressed as a ratio (VR). Estimates were pooled by random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Calcium channel blockers reduced interindividual variability in SBP when added to another agent (VR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.87; P=0.0002; 12 trials; 1565 patients) with a smaller reduction with diuretics (VR, 0.85; 0.71 to 1.01; P=0.07; 17 trials; 3217 patients). Adding other agents to calcium channel blockers did not significantly affect SBP variability (VR, 1.06; 0.83 to 1.34; P=0.65; 12 trials; 1460 patients) despite a 5.8-mm Hg reduction in mean SBP. Randomization to a higher dose of calcium channel blockers reduced SBP variability (VR, 0.84; 0.74 to 0.94; P=0.004; 25 trials; 2179 patients), whereas randomization to a higher dose of β-blockers increased SBP variability (VR, 1.31; 1.01 to 1.69; P=0.034; 6 trials; 486 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Effects of antihypertensive drugs on SBP variability are dose-dependent and persist when used in combinations. Use of a high dose of a calcium channel blocker alone or in combination with other agents is therefore likely to be particularly effective in prevention of stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21817143     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.611566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  38 in total

1.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability Increases Over a 10-Year Follow-Up in Community-Dwelling Older People.

Authors:  Claire McDonald; Mark S Pearce; Joanna Wincenciak; Simon R J Kerr; Julia L Newton
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Lowering of blood pressure for recurrent stroke prevention.

Authors:  Andrea D Boan; Daniel T Lackland; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan E Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Prior Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of PRoFESS.

Authors:  Adam de Havenon; Nora F Fino; Brian Johnson; Ka-Ho Wong; Jennifer J Majersik; David Tirschwell; Natalia Rost
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Blood pressure control versus atrial fibrillation management in stroke prevention.

Authors:  Carmine Savoia; Lidia Sada; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Blood Pressure Variability and Neurologic Outcome After Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the BEST Study.

Authors:  Eva A Mistry; Tapan Mehta; Akshitkumar Mistry; Niraj Arora; Amy K Starosciak; Felipe De Los Rios La Rosa; James Ernest Siegler; Rohan Chitale; Mohammad Anadani; Shadi Yaghi; Pooja Khatri; Adam de Havenon
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The impact of aerobic exercise on blood pressure variability.

Authors:  N Pagonas; F Dimeo; F Bauer; F Seibert; F Kiziler; W Zidek; T H Westhoff
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 8.  Clinical relevance of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability: impact on renal outcomes.

Authors:  G Parati; X Liu; J E Ochoa
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 9.  The effect of antihypertensive treatment on headache and blood pressure variability in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alastair John Stewart Webb; Peter Malcolm Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Blood pressure and stroke: From incidence to outcome.

Authors:  Simona Lattanzi; Francesco Brigo; Mauro Silvestrini
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-04-07       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.