Literature DB >> 21816917

Discharge disposition following vertebroplasty.

R E Harvey1, D F Kallmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: A variety of factors, such as pain level at rest and with activity, have been used to assess outcome of the VP procedure. However, few studies have assessed discharge disposition as a reflection of VP efficacy in the inpatient population. The purpose of this study was to compare patient disposition status before and after VP and determine what relationship exists between the treatment and patient discharge status.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of inpatients who underwent consultation for consideration of spinal augmentation for treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures. We gathered data concerning patients' demographics, living arrangements before hospitalization, discharge disposition, quantitative and qualitative pain levels, and length of hospital stay before and following VP.
RESULTS: Ninety inpatients underwent VP, 73 (81%) of whom lived independently at home before hospitalization. Of these 73 patients, 31 (42%) returned home after discharge, 9 (12%) returned home with home health care assistance, and 32 (44%) were sent to skilled nursing facilities. Six (7%) of the 90 patients resided in assisted-living centers before hospitalization; all of these patients were discharged to assisted-living or skilled nursing facilities. Eight (9%) of the 90 patients resided at skilled nursing centers before hospitalization, and all returned to nursing centers after their hospital stay. Discharge disposition was not significantly associated with preoperative pain levels at rest or with activity (P = .76 and P = .23, respectively) or with postoperative pain levels at rest or with activity (P = .08 and P = .25, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients undergoing VP as inpatients are often discharged to rehabilitation centers rather than home, irrespective of their status before hospitalization or their pre- and postoperative pain levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21816917      PMCID: PMC7965381          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of 5766 vertebral compression fractures treated with or without kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Jay M Zampini; Andrew P White; Kevin J McGuire
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy.

Authors:  Terrence H Diamond; Bernard Champion; William A Clark
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Vertebroplasty in the inpatient population.

Authors:  Andrew T Trout; Leigh A Gray; David F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Flavio Tancioni; Martin Lorenzetti; Pierina Navarria; Andrea Nozza; Luca Castagna; Paolo Gaetani; Enrico Aimar; Daniel Levi; Antonio Di Ieva; Patrizia Pisano; Armando Santoro; Marta Scorsetti; Riccardo Rodriguez y Baena
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Vertebroplasty for the treatment of traumatic nonosteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  E M Knavel; K R Thielen; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  National trends in vertebral augmentation procedures for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Shivanand P Lad; Chirag G Patil; Eleonora M Lad; Melanie G Hayden; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2008-06-02

7.  Vertebroplasty, first 1000 levels of a single center: evaluation of the outcomes and complications.

Authors:  K F Layton; K R Thielen; C A Koch; P H Luetmer; J I Lane; J T Wald; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Predicting discharge placement and health care needs after lumbar spine laminectomy.

Authors:  Saddam F Kanaan; Hung-Wen Yeh; Russell L Waitman; Douglas C Burton; Paul M Arnold; Neena K Sharma
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2014

2.  Structural equation model analysis of the length-of-hospital stay after lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Saddam F Kanaan; Lemuel R Waitman; Hung-Wen Yeh; Paul M Arnold; Douglas C Burton; Neena K Sharma
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Is severe pain immediately after spinal augmentation a predictor of long-term outcomes?

Authors:  Y W Cho; J S McDonald; A E Rad; J J Ocel; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Why does patients' discharge delay after vertebral augmentation? A factor analysis of 1,442 patients.

Authors:  He Zhao; Zhengping Zhang; Yanjun Wang; Bing Qian; Xinhao Cao; Ming Yang; Yangjin Liu; Qinpeng Zhao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 5.  Vertebroplasty in patients with tumour-related vertebral fractures: is rehabilitation needed?

Authors:  Massimiliano Polastri; Alessandro Gasbarrini
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-09-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.