Literature DB >> 21816627

Characterizing the inflammatory reaction in explanted Medtronic Freestyle stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis over a 6-year period.

Vidhya Nair1, Kelsey B Law, Alice Y Li, Katharine R B Phillips, Tirone E David, Jagdish Butany.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Medtronic Freestyle valve is a stentless porcine valve with reportedly excellent clinical and hemodynamic results, but little has been reported about its long-term pathology.
METHODS: Seventeen Freestyle valves were explanted (from 2003 to 2009) and reviewed to assess reasons for bioprosthesis failure. All valves were examined in detail, using histochemistry and immunohistochemistry to identify morphological changes, as well as cellular and humoral responses.
RESULTS: One Freestyle valve, explanted for mitral valve endocarditis on the fifth postoperative day, was excluded from analysis. The average implant duration was 71.1±35.2 months. Six valves were explanted for infective endocarditis, six for aortic insufficiency, and four for aortic stenosis. Calcification was seen in 11 explants, pannus in 15, thrombus in 12, cusp tears in 9, and 10 explants showed needle tract-like injuries. A chronic inflammatory reaction involving the xenograft arterial wall was seen in 15 of 16 valves. The cells were composed of macrophages and lymphocytes, including T cells (CD8 positive) and B cells. Significant damage to the porcine aortic wall was seen in 15 cases, and cusp myocardial shelf damage in 7 cases. All cases stained positively for IgG and C4dpar.
CONCLUSIONS: The porcine aortic tissue showed T cell-mediated rejection and significant aortic medial damage, consistent with dilatation of the porcine aortic root. The demonstration of IgG suggests the likelihood of humoral rejection, in addition to cellular rejection. One of the underlying possibilities is that the porcine aortic tissues are inadequately fixed, hence the retained antigenicity.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21816627     DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2011.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Pathol        ISSN: 1054-8807            Impact factor:   2.185


  5 in total

1.  Morphometrical and biomechanical analyses of a stentless bioprosthetic valve: an implication to avoid potential primary tissue failure.

Authors:  Hiroki Takaya; Shinya Masuda; Masaaki Naganuma; Ichiro Yoshioka; Goro Takahashi; Masatoshi Akiyama; Osamu Adachi; Kiichiro Kumagai; Shukei Sugita; Yoshikatsu Saiki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28

2.  Pseudoaneurysm formation after medtronic freestyle porcine aortic bioprosthesis implantation: a word of caution.

Authors:  Brian R Englum; Elizabeth N Pavlisko; Molly C Mack; Asvin M Ganapathi; Matthew A Schechter; Jennifer M Hanna; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  T Cell Response in Patients with Implanted Biological and Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves.

Authors:  L Barbarash; I Kudryavtsev; N Rutkovskaya; A Golovkin
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 4.  In Situ "Humanization" of Porcine Bioprostheses: Demonstration of Tendon Bioprostheses Conversion into Human ACL and Possible Implications for Heart Valve Bioprostheses.

Authors:  Uri Galili; Kevin R Stone
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-12

5.  Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Update 2020.

Authors:  Alexander E Kostyunin; Arseniy E Yuzhalin; Maria A Rezvova; Evgeniy A Ovcharenko; Tatiana V Glushkova; Anton G Kutikhin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.