Literature DB >> 21816353

Factors affecting placebo acceptability: deception, outcome, and disease severity.

Nkaku R Kisaalita1, Daniela Roditi, Michael E Robinson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A burgeoning body of evidence supports the efficacy and elucidates the mechanisms of placebo analgesia. Debate persists, however, concerning their ethical use, with many of the present arguments being philosophically based. The present web-based study empirically investigated the acceptability of an analgesic placebo treatment. Participants (103) responded to vignettes depicting patients receiving a placebo analgesic. We experimentally manipulated: 1) placebo treatment instructions (level of deception); 2) treatment outcome; and 3) patients' pain severity. Participants rated vignettes on outcome measures of deception, physician-patient relationship, and patient mood. Participants then characterized a range of placebo acceptability through ratings of deceptiveness, effectiveness, and negative consequences. Results showed that placebos described as "medication shown to be a powerful analgesic in some people" were equally deceptive as those described as "standard drug treatment." Ratings of patient mood and physician approval were determined as much by treatment instruction as by treatment outcome and an analgesic response mitigated the negative consequences of deceptive administration. Participants tolerated moderate effectiveness and considerable negative consequences in an acceptable placebo, although results suggest lay individuals may not have a sophisticated conceptualization of placebo effectiveness. Studies altering individuals' understanding of placebo effectiveness and mechanisms are needed to identify additional factors determining placebo acceptability. PERSPECTIVE: This study represents an empirical examination of analgesic placebo acceptability among lay individuals. This article is the first to systematically manipulate deception, treatment outcome, and disease severity to determine how these factors interact to differentially determine placebo acceptability-a highly relevant finding that informs the clinical use of placebo.
Copyright © 2011 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21816353      PMCID: PMC3150516          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.02.353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  31 in total

1.  Ethics, deception, and 'Those Milgram experiments'.

Authors:  C D Herrera
Journal:  J Appl Philos       Date:  2001

2.  The ethics of placebo-controlled trials--a middle ground.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; F G Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical?

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; Howard Brody
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Distinguishing dilemmas in the ethics of placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Karen Kovach
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  The use of placebo interventions in medical practice--a national questionnaire survey of Danish clinicians.

Authors:  Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Michael Norup
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  The ethics of the placebo in clinical practice.

Authors:  P Lichtenberg; U Heresco-Levy; U Nitzan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  The contributions of suggestion, desire, and expectation to placebo effects in irritable bowel syndrome patients. An empirical investigation.

Authors:  Lene Vase; Michael E Robinson; G Nicholas Verne; Donald D Price
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  The lie that heals: the ethics of giving placebos.

Authors:  H Brody
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Questionnaire survey on use of placebo.

Authors:  Uriel Nitzan; Pesach Lichtenberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-17

10.  Focus group interviews examining attitudes toward medical research among the Japanese: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Atsushi Asai; Motoki Ohnishi; Etsuyo Nishigaki; Miho Sekimoto; Shunichi Fukuhara; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.898

View more
  7 in total

1.  Placebo use in pain management: The role of medical context, treatment efficacy, and deception in determining placebo acceptability.

Authors:  Nkaku Kisaalita; Roland Staud; Robert Hurley; Michael Robinson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Placebo disclosure does not result in negative changes in mood or attitudes towards health care or the provider.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-03-09

3.  Placebo Use in Pain Management: A Mechanism-Based Educational Intervention Enhances Placebo Treatment Acceptability.

Authors:  Nkaku R Kisaalita; Robert W Hurley; Roland Staud; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Analgesic placebo treatment perceptions: acceptability, efficacy, and knowledge.

Authors:  Nkaku R Kisaalita; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Research on placebo analgesia is relevant to clinical practice.

Authors:  Charles W Gay; Mark D Bishop
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-02-03

6.  Placebo acceptability in chronic pain patients: More dependent on application mode and resulting condition than on individual factors.

Authors:  Tilman Wolter; Barbara Kleinmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  When and why placebo-prescribing is acceptable and unacceptable: a focus group study of patients' views.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; Lizzi Aizlewood; Alison E M Adams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.