Literature DB >> 21816309

Reduction of the risk of recurring heart failure events with cardiac resynchronization therapy: MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).

Ilan Goldenberg1, W Jackson Hall, Christopher A Beck, Arthur J Moss, Alon Barsheshet, Scott McNitt, Slava Polonsky, Mary W Brown, Wojciech Zareba.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of the risk of recurring heart failure events (HFEs) was a pre-specified substudy of MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).
BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on the occurrence of recurring heart failure episodes after a first post-implantation HFE.
METHODS: Data with regard to recurring HFEs were prospectively collected for all 1,820 MADIT-CRT participants. The CRT-D versus defibrillator-only risk for nonfatal first- and subsequent-HFEs was assessed by Cox proportional hazards and Andersen-Gill proportional intensity regression modeling, respectively, in efficacy analyses recognizing active device-type during follow-up.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that CRT-D was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of a first HFE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44 to 0.67, p < 0.001) and with a similar magnitude of reduction in the risk of HFEs subsequent to a first post-enrollment event (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.85, p = 0.003). The benefit of CRT-D for the prevention of first and subsequent HFEs was pronounced among patients with left bundle branch block (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.49, p < 0.001; and HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.76, p = 0.001, respectively) and nonsignificant in non-left bundle branch block patients (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.64, p = 0.55; and HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.69, p = 0.96, respectively; p values for interaction: p < 0.001 and p = 0.06, respectively). The occurrences of first and second HFEs were associated with 7- and nearly 19-fold respective increases in the risk of subsequent mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: In the MADIT-CRT trial, the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy for the reduction in recurring HFEs was maintained after the occurrence of a first post-enrollment event. The occurrence of HFEs greatly increased the risk of death. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; NCT00180271).
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21816309     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  16 in total

1.  Clinical trials of antiarrhythmic therapies and optimizing health care resource deployment: the need for a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Sanjeev Saksena
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Heart failure in 2011: Heart failure therapy--technology to the fore.

Authors:  John J V McMurray
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Roles and indications for use of implantable defibrillator and resynchronization therapy in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure.

Authors:  Yitschak Biton; Jayson R Baman; Bronislava Polonsky
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Estimating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and their confidence intervals with different terminating events for survival time and costs.

Authors:  Shuai Chen; Hongwei Zhao
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Circulating MicroRNA-30d Is Associated With Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure and Regulates Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis: A Translational Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yonathan F Melman; Ravi Shah; Kirsty Danielson; Junjie Xiao; Bridget Simonson; Andreas Barth; Khalid Chakir; Gregory D Lewis; Zachary Lavender; Quynh A Truong; Andre Kleber; Ranendra Das; Anthony Rosenzweig; Yaoyu Wang; David Kass; Jagmeet P Singh; Saumya Das
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  QRS prolongation after cardiac resynchronization therapy is a predictor of persistent mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Oguz Karaca; Onur Omaygenc; Beytullah Cakal; Sinem Deniz Cakal; Irfan Barutcu; Bilal Boztosun; Fethi Kilicaslan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events.

Authors:  Naomi D Herz; Joseph Engeda; Robbert Zusterzeel; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; David G Strauss; Samantha B Jacobs; Kimberly A Selzman; Ileana L Piña; Daniel A Caños
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Electrical devices for left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure: do we need revised guidelines?

Authors:  Maya Guglin; S Serge Barold
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the MADIT-CRT trial.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Peter Veazie; William Jackson Hall; Hongwei Zhao; April Buttaccio; Kelly Thevenet-Morrison; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.