Literature DB >> 21816171

Effects of freezing profile parameters on the survival of cryopreserved rat embryonic neural cells.

Adam Z Higgins1, D Kacy Cullen, Michelle C LaPlaca, Jens O M Karlsson.   

Abstract

The ability to successfully cryopreserve neural cells would represent an important advance with benefits to neural tissue engineering, neural transplantation, and neuroscience research. We have examined key factors responsible for damage to rat embryonic neural cells during cryopreservation using a two-step temperature profile, with an emphasis on the effects of cooling rate and plunge temperature. Our results indicate that the initial addition of 8% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and seeding of extracellular ice do not significantly decrease viable cell yield. However, subsequent freezing resulted in significant cell losses for all profile parameter combinations examined. A maximum post-thaw survival of 56% (compared to unfrozen controls) was observed after cooling at 2°C/min to -80°C followed by direct immersion in liquid nitrogen. Single-step removal of DMSO after thawing was associated with an additional 40-70% loss of viable cells, and the number of viable cells was further reduced by approximately 70% after 2 days of cell culture (resulting in a net viable cell yield of 9.6±0.4%). Nonetheless, the cryopreserved neurons that did survive displayed a normal morphology, including formation of neurites. Trends in neuronal viability conformed with predictions of existing theoretical models of cell freezing, with reduced survival for rapid cooling rates or high plunge temperatures (attributable to intracellular ice formation), and decreasing viability with increasing profile duration (consistent with the known effects of cell dehydration at suboptimal cooling rates). These observations suggest that neural cells are good candidates for further refinement of freezing profile design using a physics-based approach to parameter optimization.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21816171     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  8 in total

1.  Optimization of cryoprotectant loading into murine and human oocytes.

Authors:  Jens O M Karlsson; Edyta A Szurek; Adam Z Higgins; Sang R Lee; Ali Eroglu
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Terahertz imaging of excised oral cancer at frozen temperature.

Authors:  Yookyeong Carolyn Sim; Jae Yeon Park; Kang-Min Ahn; Chansik Park; Joo-Hiuk Son
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Finasteride inhibits human prostate cancer cell invasion through MMP2 and MMP9 downregulation.

Authors:  Andrei Moroz; Flávia K Delella; Rodrigo Almeida; Lívia Maria Lacorte; Wágner José Fávaro; Elenice Deffune; Sérgio L Felisbino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cryopreservation of Primary Mouse Neurons: The Benefit of Neurostore Cryoprotective Medium.

Authors:  Francesca Pischedda; Caterina Montani; Julia Obergasteiger; Giulia Frapporti; Corrado Corti; Marcelo Rosato Siri; Mattia Volta; Giovanni Piccoli
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.505

5.  High Fidelity Cryopreservation and Recovery of Primary Rodent Cortical Neurons.

Authors:  Sara S Parker; Aubin Moutal; Song Cai; Sambamurthy Chandrasekaran; Mackenzie R Roman; Anita A Koshy; Rajesh Khanna; Konrad E Zinsmaier; Ghassan Mouneimne
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-09-27

Review 6.  Winter is coming: the future of cryopreservation.

Authors:  Sanja Bojic; Alex Murray; Roman Bauer; João Pedro de Magalhães; Barry L Bentley; Ralf Spindler; Piotr Pawlik; José L Cordeiro
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Characteristics of neural growth and cryopreservation of the dorsal root ganglion using three-dimensional collagen hydrogel culture versus conventional culture.

Authors:  Ze-Kai Cui; Shen-Yang Li; Kai Liao; Zhi-Jie Wang; Yong-Long Guo; Luo-Sheng Tang; Shi-Bo Tang; Jacey Hongjie Ma; Jian-Su Chen
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 5.135

8.  A non-aggressive, highly efficient, enzymatic method for dissociation of human brain-tumors and brain-tissues to viable single-cells.

Authors:  Ilan Volovitz; Netanel Shapira; Haim Ezer; Aviv Gafni; Merav Lustgarten; Tal Alter; Idan Ben-Horin; Ori Barzilai; Tal Shahar; Andrew Kanner; Itzhak Fried; Igor Veshchev; Rachel Grossman; Zvi Ram
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.288

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.