Literature DB >> 21815890

Evaluating sampling completeness in a desert plant-pollinator network.

Natacha P Chacoff1, Diego P Vázquez, Silvia B Lomáscolo, Erica L Stevani, Jimena Dorado, Benigno Padrón.   

Abstract

1. The study of plant-pollinator interactions in a network context is receiving increasing attention. This approach has helped to identify several emerging network patterns such as nestedness and modularity. However, most studies are based only on qualitative information, and some ecosystems, such as deserts and tropical forests, are underrepresented in these data sets. 2. We present an exhaustive analysis of the structure of a 4-year plant-pollinator network from the Monte desert in Argentina using qualitative and quantitative tools. We describe the structure of this network and evaluate sampling completeness using asymptotic species richness estimators. Our goal is to assess the extent to which the realized sampling effort allows for an accurate description of species interactions and to estimate the minimum number of additional censuses required to detect 90% of the interactions. We evaluated completeness of detection of the community-wide pollinator fauna, of the pollinator fauna associated with each plant species and of the plant-pollinator interactions. We also evaluated whether sampling completeness was influenced by plant characteristics, such as flower abundance, flower life span, number of interspecific links (degree) and selectiveness in the identity of their flower visitors, as well as sampling effort. 3. We found that this desert plant-pollinator network has a nested structure and that it exhibits modularity and high network-level generalization. 4. In spite of our high sampling effort, and although we sampled 80% of the pollinator fauna, we recorded only 55% of the interactions. Furthermore, although a 64% increase in sampling effort would suffice to detect 90% of the pollinator species, a fivefold increase in sampling effort would be necessary to detect 90% of the interactions. 5. Detection of interactions was incomplete for most plant species, particularly specialists with a long flowering season and high flower abundance, or generalists with short flowering span and scant flowers. Our results suggest that sampling of a network with the same effort for all plant species is inadequate to sample interactions. 6. Sampling the diversity of interactions is labour intensive, and most plant-pollinator networks published to date are likely to be undersampled. Our analysis allowed estimating the completeness of our sampling, the additional effort needed to detect most interactions and the plant traits that influence the detection of their interactions.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21815890     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01883.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  36 in total

1.  How phylogeny shapes the taxonomic and functional structure of plant-insect networks.

Authors:  Sébastien Ibanez; Fabien Arène; Sébastien Lavergne
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Consequences of plant invasions on compartmentalization and species' roles in plant-pollinator networks.

Authors:  Matthias Albrecht; Benigno Padrón; Ignasi Bartomeus; Anna Traveset
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Processes entangling interactions in communities: forbidden links are more important than abundance in a hummingbird-plant network.

Authors:  Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni; Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama; Marlies Sazima
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The specificity of host-bat fly interaction networks across vegetation and seasonal variation.

Authors:  Mariana Zarazúa-Carbajal; Romeo A Saldaña-Vázquez; César A Sandoval-Ruiz; Kathryn E Stoner; Julieta Benitez-Malvido
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Strong specificity and network modularity at a very fine phylogenetic scale in the lichen genus Peltigera.

Authors:  P L Chagnon; N Magain; J Miadlikowska; F Lutzoni
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Predicting cryptic links in host-parasite networks.

Authors:  Tad Dallas; Andrew W Park; John M Drake
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Entropic measure unveils country competitiveness and product specialization in the World trade web.

Authors:  Gianluca Teza; Michele Caraglio; Attilio L Stella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Reconstruction of plant-pollinator networks from observational data.

Authors:  Jean-Gabriel Young; Fernanda S Valdovinos; M E J Newman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Molecular diet analysis of neotropical bats based on fecal DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Melissa R Ingala; Nancy B Simmons; Claudia Wultsch; Konstantinos Krampis; Kaiya L Provost; Susan L Perkins
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Parasites affect food web structure primarily through increased diversity and complexity.

Authors:  Jennifer A Dunne; Kevin D Lafferty; Andrew P Dobson; Ryan F Hechinger; Armand M Kuris; Neo D Martinez; John P McLaughlin; Kim N Mouritsen; Robert Poulin; Karsten Reise; Daniel B Stouffer; David W Thieltges; Richard J Williams; Claus Dieter Zander
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.