BACKGROUND: Educational level has repeatedly been identified as an important determinant of access to health care, but little is known about its influence on end-of-life care use. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between individual educational attainment and end-of-life care use and to assess the importance of individual educational attainment in explaining differential end-of-life care use. RESEARCH DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study via a nationwide sentinel network of general practitioners (GPs; SENTI-MELC Study) provided data on end-of-life care utilization. Multilevel analysis was used to model the association between educational level and health care use, adjusting for individual and contextual confounders based upon Andersen's behavioral model of health services use. SUBJECTS: A Belgian nationwide representative sample of people who died not suddenly in 2005-2007. RESULTS: In comparison to their less educated counterparts, higher educated people equally often had a palliative treatment goal but more often used multidisciplinary palliative care services (odds ratios [OR] for lower secondary education 1.28 [1.04-1.59] and for higher [secondary] education: 1.31 [1.02-1.68]), moved between care settings more frequently (OR: 1.68 [1.13-2.48] for lower secondary education and 1.51 [0.93-2.48] for higher [secondary] education) and had more contacts with the GP in the final 3 months of life. CONCLUSIONS: Less well-educated people appear to be disadvantaged in terms of access to specialist palliative care services, and GP contacts at the end of life, suggesting a need for empowerment of less well-educated terminally ill people regarding specialist palliative and general end-of-life care use.
BACKGROUND: Educational level has repeatedly been identified as an important determinant of access to health care, but little is known about its influence on end-of-life care use. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between individual educational attainment and end-of-life care use and to assess the importance of individual educational attainment in explaining differential end-of-life care use. RESEARCH DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study via a nationwide sentinel network of general practitioners (GPs; SENTI-MELC Study) provided data on end-of-life care utilization. Multilevel analysis was used to model the association between educational level and health care use, adjusting for individual and contextual confounders based upon Andersen's behavioral model of health services use. SUBJECTS: A Belgian nationwide representative sample of people who died not suddenly in 2005-2007. RESULTS: In comparison to their less educated counterparts, higher educated people equally often had a palliative treatment goal but more often used multidisciplinary palliative care services (odds ratios [OR] for lower secondary education 1.28 [1.04-1.59] and for higher [secondary] education: 1.31 [1.02-1.68]), moved between care settings more frequently (OR: 1.68 [1.13-2.48] for lower secondary education and 1.51 [0.93-2.48] for higher [secondary] education) and had more contacts with the GP in the final 3 months of life. CONCLUSIONS: Less well-educated people appear to be disadvantaged in terms of access to specialist palliative care services, and GP contacts at the end of life, suggesting a need for empowerment of less well-educated terminally ill people regarding specialist palliative and general end-of-life care use.
Authors: Anna Santos Salas; Sharon M Watanabe; Yoko Tarumi; Tracy Wildeman; Ana M Hermosa García; Bisi Adewale; Wendy Duggleby Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Richard Taylor; Gabrielle Rocque; Carol Chambless; Thomas Ramsey; Andres Azuero; Nataliya Ivankova; Michelle Y Martin; Marie A Bakitas Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Kenneth Chambaere; Judith A C Rietjens; Joachim Cohen; Koen Pardon; Reginald Deschepper; H Roeline W Pasman; Luc Deliens Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-11-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jiaoli Cai; Li Zhang; Denise Guerriere; Hongli Fan; Peter C Coyte Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390