PURPOSE: Housework is a form of regular manual work that is often performed by women. Little is known about the entity of biomechanical exposure to the upper limbs during typical housework tasks. This study aims to make an initial quantitative estimate of some such exposures. METHODS: We conducted objective assessments of biomechanical exposure to the upper limbs during nine frequent housework tasks performed by 12 women without domestic help. For the main evaluations, we implemented five instruments: the OCRA (Occupational Repetitive Actions) checklist; OREGE (Outil de Repérage et d'Evaluation des Gestes); the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) assessment of hand activity levels (HAL); RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment); and the full checklist of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. RESULTS: The ACGIH evaluation suggested light/moderate biomechanical exposure levels, as did the RULA. For the OCRA checklist and OREGE, time-weighted average scores (not adjusted by a duration multiplier because women may also routinely undergo biomechanical loads in other domestic or professional settings) were: OCRA checklist, 12.0 ("mild risk", light red) and OREGE, 10.2 ("not recommended"). The full checklist of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries showed that repetitive/similar movements (for >2 h/day) accompanied by other risk factors such as ≥30° bending of the wrists, ≥45° stretched wrists, ≥30° ulnar stretches, and manual force. CONCLUSIONS: Housework commonly entails light-moderate biomechanical loads that nevertheless could conceivably contribute to the genesis/worsening of musculoskeletal disorders. Biomechanical loads experienced by women during housework deserve greater consideration in epidemiologic studies of musculoskeletal disorders.
PURPOSE: Housework is a form of regular manual work that is often performed by women. Little is known about the entity of biomechanical exposure to the upper limbs during typical housework tasks. This study aims to make an initial quantitative estimate of some such exposures. METHODS: We conducted objective assessments of biomechanical exposure to the upper limbs during nine frequent housework tasks performed by 12 women without domestic help. For the main evaluations, we implemented five instruments: the OCRA (Occupational Repetitive Actions) checklist; OREGE (Outil de Repérage et d'Evaluation des Gestes); the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) assessment of hand activity levels (HAL); RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment); and the full checklist of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. RESULTS: The ACGIH evaluation suggested light/moderate biomechanical exposure levels, as did the RULA. For the OCRA checklist and OREGE, time-weighted average scores (not adjusted by a duration multiplier because women may also routinely undergo biomechanical loads in other domestic or professional settings) were: OCRA checklist, 12.0 ("mild risk", light red) and OREGE, 10.2 ("not recommended"). The full checklist of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries showed that repetitive/similar movements (for >2 h/day) accompanied by other risk factors such as ≥30° bending of the wrists, ≥45° stretched wrists, ≥30° ulnar stretches, and manual force. CONCLUSIONS: Housework commonly entails light-moderate biomechanical loads that nevertheless could conceivably contribute to the genesis/worsening of musculoskeletal disorders. Biomechanical loads experienced by women during housework deserve greater consideration in epidemiologic studies of musculoskeletal disorders.
Authors: Stefano Mattioli; Alberto Baldasseroni; Massimo Bovenzi; Stefania Curti; Robin M T Cooke; Giuseppe Campo; Pietro G Barbieri; Rinaldo Ghersi; Marco Broccoli; Maria Pia Cancellieri; Anna Maria Colao; Marco Dell'omo; Pirous Fateh-Moghadam; Flavia Franceschini; Serenella Fucksia; Paolo Galli; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Roberto Lucchini; Anna Mandes; Teresa Marras; Carla Sgarrella; Stefano Borghesi; Mauro Fierro; Francesca Zanardi; Gianpiero Mancini; Francesco S Violante Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: S Mattioli; A Baldasseroni; S Curti; R M T Cooke; A Mandes; F Zanardi; A Farioli; E Buiatti; G Campo; F S Violante Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2009-03-01 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Andrea Farioli; Stefania Curti; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Alberto Baldasseroni; Giovanna Spatari; Stefano Mattioli; Francesco Saverio Violante Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Christian Maurer-Grubinger; Jasmin Haenel; Laura Fraeulin; Fabian Holzgreve; Eileen M Wanke; David A Groneberg; Daniela Ohlendorf Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Abisola Osinuga; Brandi Janssen; Nathan B Fethke; William T Story; John A Imaledo; Kelly K Baker Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: C Maurer-Grubinger; J Haenel; L Fraeulin; F Holzgreve; E M Wanke; D A Groneberg; D Ohlendorf Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 4.379