Literature DB >> 21813746

Rhythmic movements are larger and faster but with the same frequency on removal of visual feedback.

S Levy-Tzedek1, M Ben Tov, A Karniel.   

Abstract

The brain controls rhythmic movement through neural circuits combining visual information with proprioceptive information from the limbs. Although rhythmic movements are fundamental to everyday activities the specific details of the responsible control mechanisms remain elusive. We tested 39 young adults who performed flexion/extension movements of the forearm. We provided them with explicit knowledge of the amplitude and the speed of their movements, whereas frequency information was only implicitly available. In a series of 3 experiments, we demonstrate a tighter control of frequency compared with amplitude or speed. We found that in the absence of visual feedback, movements had larger amplitude and higher peak speed while maintaining the same frequency as when visual feedback was available; this was the case even when participants were aware of performing overly large and fast movements. Finally, when participants were asked to modulate continuously movement frequency, but not amplitude, we found the local coefficient of variability of movement frequency to be lower than that of amplitude. We suggest that a misperception of the generated amplitude in the absence of visual feedback, coupled with a highly accurate perception of generated frequency, leads to the performance of larger and faster movements with the same frequency when visual feedback is not available. Relatively low local coefficient of variability of frequency in a task that calls for continuous change in movement frequency suggests that we tend to operate at a constant frequency at the expense of variation in amplitude and peak speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21813746     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00266.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Time flies when you are in a groove: using entrainment to mechanical resonance to teach a desired movement distorts the perception of the movement's timing.

Authors:  Daniel K Zondervan; Jaime E Duarte; Justin B Rowe; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of ellipses drawing by sonification.

Authors:  Eric O Boyer; Frederic Bevilacqua; Emmanuel Guigon; Sylvain Hanneton; Agnes Roby-Brami
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Performance drifts in two-finger cyclical force production tasks performed by one and two actors.

Authors:  Fariba Hasanbarani; Sasha Reschechtko; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Eye-hand synergy and intermittent behaviors during target-directed tracking with visual and non-visual information.

Authors:  Chien-Ting Huang; Ing-Shiou Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The effects of rhythmicity and amplitude on transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Mor Ben-Tov; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Amir Karniel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Motor errors lead to enhanced performance in older adults.

Authors:  S Levy-Tzedek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Improvement in upper-limb UPDRS motor scores following fast-paced arm exercise: A pilot study.

Authors:  Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Dan Arbelle; Dan Forman; Yair Zlotnik
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age.

Authors:  Karin Petrini; Andrea Caradonna; Celia Foster; Neil Burgess; Marko Nardini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Other ways of seeing: From behavior to neural mechanisms in the online "visual" control of action with sensory substitution.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; James Gwinnutt; Sara Dell'Erba; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Alexandra A de Sousa; David J Brown
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Changes in Predictive Task Switching with Age and with Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Shelly Levy-Tzedek
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.