Literature DB >> 21813694

The detection of visual contrast in the behaving mouse.

Laura Busse1, Asli Ayaz, Neel T Dhruv, Steffen Katzner, Aman B Saleem, Marieke L Schölvinck, Andrew D Zaharia, Matteo Carandini.   

Abstract

The mouse is becoming a key species for research on the neural circuits of the early visual system. To relate such circuits to perception, one must measure visually guided behavior and ask how it depends on fundamental stimulus attributes such as visual contrast. Using operant conditioning, we trained mice to detect visual contrast in a two-alternative forced-choice task. After 3-4 weeks of training, mice performed hundreds of trials in each session. Numerous sessions yielded high-quality psychometric curves from which we inferred measures of contrast sensitivity. In multiple sessions, however, choices were influenced not only by contrast, but also by estimates of reward value and by irrelevant factors such as recent failures and rewards. This behavior was captured by a generalized linear model involving not only the visual responses to the current stimulus but also a bias term and history terms depending on the outcome of the previous trial. We compared the behavioral performance of the mice to predictions of a simple decoder applied to neural responses measured in primary visual cortex of awake mice during passive viewing. The decoder performed better than the animal, suggesting that mice might not use optimally the information contained in the activity of visual cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21813694      PMCID: PMC6623377          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6689-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

1.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats.

Authors:  G T Prusky; P W West; R M Douglas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The relative influences of priors and sensory evidence on an oculomotor decision variable during perceptual learning.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Chi-Tat Law; Patrick Connolly; Sharath Bennur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function.

Authors:  D G Albrecht; D B Hamilton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Tests of the mouse visual system.

Authors:  L H Pinto; C Enroth-Cugell
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Rats are able to navigate in virtual environments.

Authors:  C Hölscher; A Schnee; H Dahmen; L Setia; H A Mallot
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Chronic cellular imaging of mouse visual cortex during operant behavior and passive viewing.

Authors:  Mark L Andermann; A M Kerlin; R C Reid
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses.

Authors:  Jessica A Cardin; Marie Carlén; Konstantinos Meletis; Ulf Knoblich; Feng Zhang; Karl Deisseroth; Li-Huei Tsai; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Intracellular dynamics of hippocampal place cells during virtual navigation.

Authors:  Christopher D Harvey; Forrest Collman; Daniel A Dombeck; David W Tank
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  135 in total

1.  Posterior Parietal Cortex Guides Visual Decisions in Rats.

Authors:  Angela M Licata; Matthew T Kaufman; David Raposo; Michael B Ryan; John P Sheppard; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Primary Tactile Thalamus Spiking Reflects Cognitive Signals.

Authors:  Christian Waiblinger; Clarissa J Whitmire; Audrey Sederberg; Garrett B Stanley; Cornelius Schwarz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Stimulus Context and Reward Contingency Induce Behavioral Adaptation in a Rodent Tactile Detection Task.

Authors:  Christian Waiblinger; Caroline M Wu; Michael F Bolus; Peter Y Borden; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dynamic weighting of multisensory stimuli shapes decision-making in rats and humans.

Authors:  John P Sheppard; David Raposo; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  MATLAB-based automated patch-clamp system for awake behaving mice.

Authors:  Niraj S Desai; Jennifer J Siegel; William Taylor; Raymond A Chitwood; Daniel Johnston
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Big behavioral data: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience.

Authors:  Alex Gomez-Marin; Joseph J Paton; Adam R Kampff; Rui M Costa; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Predicting Perceptual Decisions Using Visual Cortical Population Responses and Choice History.

Authors:  Anna Ivic Jasper; Seiji Tanabe; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Dissociation of Choice Formation and Choice-Correlated Activity in Macaque Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Corey M Ziemba; Gabriel M Stine; Eero P Simoncelli; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Reinforcement biases subsequent perceptual decisions when confidence is low, a widespread behavioral phenomenon.

Authors:  Armin Lak; Emily Hueske; Junya Hirokawa; Paul Masset; Torben Ott; Anne E Urai; Tobias H Donner; Matteo Carandini; Susumu Tonegawa; Naoshige Uchida; Adam Kepecs
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.