BACKGROUND: Home smoking bans significantly reduce the likelihood of secondhand smoke exposure among children and non-smoking adults. The purpose of this study was to examine national trends in (1) the adoption of home smoking bans, (2) discrepancies in parental smoking ban reports and (3) household and parental correlates of home smoking bans among households with underage children from 1995 to 2007. METHODS: The authors used data from the 1995-1996, 1998-1999, 2001-2002, 2003 and 2006-2007 Tobacco Use Supplement of the US Current Population Survey to estimate prevalence rates and logistic regression models of parental smoking ban reports by survey period. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of a complete home smoking bans increased from 58.1% to 83.8% (p<0.01), while discrepancies in parental reports decreased from 12.5% to 4.6% (p<0.01) from 1995 to 2007. Households with single parent, low income, one or two current smokers, parents with less than a college education or without infants were consistently less likely to report a home smoking ban over this period (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite general improvements in the adoption of home smoking bans and a reduction on parental discrepancies, disparities in the level of protection from secondhand smoke have persisted over time. Children living in households with single parents, low income, current smoker parents, less educated parents or without infants are less likely to be protected by a home smoking ban. These groups are in need of interventions promoting the adoption of home smoking bans to reduce disparities in tobacco-related diseases.
BACKGROUND: Home smoking bans significantly reduce the likelihood of secondhand smoke exposure among children and non-smoking adults. The purpose of this study was to examine national trends in (1) the adoption of home smoking bans, (2) discrepancies in parental smoking ban reports and (3) household and parental correlates of home smoking bans among households with underage children from 1995 to 2007. METHODS: The authors used data from the 1995-1996, 1998-1999, 2001-2002, 2003 and 2006-2007 Tobacco Use Supplement of the US Current Population Survey to estimate prevalence rates and logistic regression models of parental smoking ban reports by survey period. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of a complete home smoking bans increased from 58.1% to 83.8% (p<0.01), while discrepancies in parental reports decreased from 12.5% to 4.6% (p<0.01) from 1995 to 2007. Households with single parent, low income, one or two current smokers, parents with less than a college education or without infants were consistently less likely to report a home smoking ban over this period (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite general improvements in the adoption of home smoking bans and a reduction on parental discrepancies, disparities in the level of protection from secondhand smoke have persisted over time. Children living in households with single parents, low income, current smoker parents, less educated parents or without infants are less likely to be protected by a home smoking ban. These groups are in need of interventions promoting the adoption of home smoking bans to reduce disparities in tobacco-related diseases.
Authors: Barbara A Pizacani; Diane P Martin; Michael J Stark; Thomas D Koepsell; Beti Thompson; Paula Diehr Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sanjat Kanjilal; Edward W Gregg; Yiling J Cheng; Ping Zhang; David E Nelson; George Mensah; Gloria L A Beckles Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-11-27
Authors: Pamela I Clark; Michael W Schooley; Bennett Pierce; Jane Schulman; Anne M Hartman; Carol L Schmitt Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Annie Montreuil; Michèle Tremblay; Michael Cantinotti; Bernard-Simon Leclerc; Benoit Lasnier; Joanna Cohen; Jennifer McGrath; Jennifer O'Loughlin Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2015-06-24
Authors: Melbourne F Hovell; Marc A Adams; C Richard Hofstetter; Ana P Martínez-Donate; Guillermo J González-Pérez; Liza S Rovniak; Marie C Boman-Davis Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Charu Mathur; Melissa H Stigler; Darin J Erickson; Cheryl L Perry; Jean L Forster Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marisa E Hilliard; Kristin A Riekert; Melbourne F Hovell; Cynthia S Rand; Josie S Welkom; Michelle N Eakin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 4.244