HYPOTHESIS: The short head bundle of the distal biceps tendon is more efficient at elbow flexion, and the long head is more efficient at forearm supination. METHODS: The short and long head bundles of the distal biceps tendon were separated to the bicipital tuberosity in 6 cadavers. The area and centroid of each bundle insertion were computed from surface points measured within each footprint. Each bundle was individually loaded. The supination torque and flexion load generated were recorded at 90° of elbow flexion. The slope of the torque generated versus biceps load was used to define the supination moment arm. The ratio of the flexion load generated to biceps load applied was used to define the relative flexion efficiency. RESULTS: The short head insertion was positioned distal and anterior relative to the long head and typically included the apex of the tuberosity. The areas of the long and short heads were 59 ± 15 and 94 ± 44 mm(2) (P = .07), respectively. The long head moment arm was significantly higher in supination. The short head had a significantly higher moment arm in neutral and pronation. The ratio of the flexion load to biceps load was 15% higher for the short head. CONCLUSION: The short and long heads of the biceps have distinct insertions. The short head's insertion allows it to be relatively more efficient at elbow flexion at 90°. In the neutral and pronated forearm, the short head is the relatively more efficient supinator. In the supinated forearm, the long head becomes relatively more efficient at supination.
HYPOTHESIS: The short head bundle of the distal biceps tendon is more efficient at elbow flexion, and the long head is more efficient at forearm supination. METHODS: The short and long head bundles of the distal biceps tendon were separated to the bicipital tuberosity in 6 cadavers. The area and centroid of each bundle insertion were computed from surface points measured within each footprint. Each bundle was individually loaded. The supination torque and flexion load generated were recorded at 90° of elbow flexion. The slope of the torque generated versus biceps load was used to define the supination moment arm. The ratio of the flexion load generated to biceps load applied was used to define the relative flexion efficiency. RESULTS: The short head insertion was positioned distal and anterior relative to the long head and typically included the apex of the tuberosity. The areas of the long and short heads were 59 ± 15 and 94 ± 44 mm(2) (P = .07), respectively. The long head moment arm was significantly higher in supination. The short head had a significantly higher moment arm in neutral and pronation. The ratio of the flexion load to biceps load was 15% higher for the short head. CONCLUSION: The short and long heads of the biceps have distinct insertions. The short head's insertion allows it to be relatively more efficient at elbow flexion at 90°. In the neutral and pronated forearm, the short head is the relatively more efficient supinator. In the supinated forearm, the long head becomes relatively more efficient at supination.
Authors: Marc Blasi; Javier de la Fuente; Carlo Martinoli; Juan Blasi; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Tomás Domingo; Maribel Miguel-Pérez Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2013-05-26 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Michel P J van den Bekerom; Izaäk F Kodde; Asir Aster; Ronald L A W Bleys; Denise Eygendaal Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Christopher C Schmidt; Tyler J Madonna; Nicholas Vaudreuil; Brandon T Brown; Stephen Y Liu; Sean Delserro; Michael P Smolinski; Joseph Styron; Patrick J Smolinski; Mark C Miller Journal: JSES Open Access Date: 2019-09-11