| Literature DB >> 21812969 |
Xinmin Liu1, Rong Cheng, Miguel Verbitsky, Sergey Kisselev, Andrew Browne, Helen Mejia-Sanatana, Elan D Louis, Lucien J Cote, Howard Andrews, Cheryl Waters, Blair Ford, Steven Frucht, Stanley Fahn, Karen Marder, Lorraine N Clark, Joseph H Lee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To date, nine Parkinson disease (PD) genome-wide association studies in North American, European and Asian populations have been published. The majority of studies have confirmed the association of the previously identified genetic risk factors, SNCA and MAPT, and two studies have identified three new PD susceptibility loci/genes (PARK16, BST1 and HLA-DRB5). In a recent meta-analysis of datasets from five of the published PD GWAS an additional 6 novel candidate genes (SYT11, ACMSD, STK39, MCCC1/LAMP3, GAK and CCDC62/HIP1R) were identified. Collectively the associations identified in these GWAS account for only a small proportion of the estimated total heritability of PD suggesting that an 'unknown' component of the genetic architecture of PD remains to be identified.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21812969 PMCID: PMC3166909 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Figure 1Quantile-Quantile plots for test statistics for SNPs passing quality control in each dataset. Figure shows -log10 (p-value) of observed association statistics in Y-axis, compared to -log10 (p-value) of the association statistics expected under the null hypothesis of no association in X-axis. The solid line represents concordance of observed and expected values. The genomic inflation factor, λ, is shown for each dataset. A) Ashkenazi Jewish (λ = 1.003), b) NINDS (λ = 1.026), and c) CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009(λ = 1.031).
Characteristics of the genotyped subjects from the Ashkenazi Jewish, NINDS, and CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009 datasets
| Ashkenazi Jews | NINDS | CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009 | Overall | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | |
| Subjects (%) | 268(60.1) | 178(39.9) | 923(53.6) | 798(46.4) | 859(50.0) | 860(50.0) | 2050(52.8) | 1836(47.2) |
| Mean age at onset/examination Year ± SD* | 59.9 ± 12.1 | 69.8 ± 8.8 | 58.5 ± 13.2 | 58.6 ± 16.4 | 61.8 ± 10.9 | 54.8 ± 13.0 | 60.0 ± 12.2 | 57.9 ± 14.9 |
| Male(%) | 255(57.2) | 886(51.5) | 850(49.4) | 1991(51.2) | ||||
| Proportion of EOPD# | 24.5% | 26.0% | 15.0% | 21.3% | ||||
| Total | 446 | 1721 | 1719 | 3886 | ||||
| Genotyping rate | 99.85 | 99.79 | 99.81 | 99.82 | ||||
| Markers passing QC | 525124 | 517805 | 334161 | |||||
* Age at onset for cases and age at examination for controls, # EOPD: Early Onset of PD, with age at onset younger than or equal to 50
Top Candidate SNPs from the Ashkenazi Jewish, NINDS and CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009 Datasets
| Ashkenazi Jewish | NINDS | CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009 | Meta-analysis | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | CHR | BP | A1 | GENE | F_A | P | OR | F_A | P | OR | F_A | P | OR | A2 | Z | P | Direction |
| F_U | 95% CI | F_U | 95% CI | F_U | 95% CI | score | |||||||||||
| rs1694037 | 3 | 21941114 | T | 0.096 | 1.02 × 10-5 | 0.42 | 0.097 | 0.849 | 1.02 | 0.121 | 0.049 | 1.24 | T | -1.3 | 0.193 | ||
| 0.199 | 0.29-0.62 | 0.095 | 0.81-1.28 | 0.100 | 1.00-1.54 | ||||||||||||
| rs4976493 | 5 | 135210022 | A | 0.442 | 6.66 × 10-5 | 1.77 | 0.403 | 0.026 | 1.17 | 0.367 | 0.190 | 0.91 | A | 2.8 | 0.005 | ||
| 0.309 | 1.34-2.35 | 0.366 | 1.02-1.34 | 0.389 | 0.79-1.05 | ||||||||||||
| rs10121009 | 9 | 35259819 | A | 0.131 | 5.32 × 10-5 | 0.49 | 0.182 | 0.045 | 0.84 | 0.185 | 0.032 | 0.83 | A | -4.7 | 2.75 × 10-6 | ||
| 0.235 | 0.34-0.69 | 0.209 | 0.71-1.00 | 0.214 | 0.70-0.98 | ||||||||||||
| rs4745122* | 9 | 73582507 | A | Intergenic | 0.351 | 5.48 × 10-5 | 1.87 | 0.243 | 0.007 | 1.25 | 0.234 | 0.748 | 0.97 | A | 3.7 | 2.15 × 10-4 | |
| 0.225 | 1.38-2.54 | 0.205 | 1.06-1.47 | 0.239 | 0.83-1.14 | ||||||||||||
| rs7171137 | 15 | 90363631 | A | 0.397 | 3.79 × 10-5 | 1.84 | 0.370 | 0.013 | 1.20 | 0.351 | 0.620 | 1.04 | A | 4.1 | 4.09 × 10-5 | ||
| 0.264 | 1.38-2.47 | 0.330 | 1.04-1.38 | 0.343 | 0.90-1.19 | ||||||||||||
| rs183211 | 17 | 42143493 | T | 0.207 | 7.16 × 10-5 | 0.54 | 0.213 | 0.102 | 0.87 | 0.196 | 0.001 | 0.77 | T | -5.1 | 2.80 × 10-7 | ||
| 0.326 | 0.40-0.73 | 0.236 | 0.75-1.03 | 0.241 | 0.65-0.90 | ||||||||||||
| rs415430 | 17 | 42214305 | C | 0.202 | 8.45 × 10-5 | 0.54 | 0.173 | 0.002 | 0.77 | C | -5.0 | 6.87 × 10-7 | -- | ||||
| -- | 0.317 | 0.40-0.74 | 0.214 | 0.65-0.91 | |||||||||||||
A1: Minor allele, A2: Associated allele, F_A: Minor allele freq. of case, F_U: Minor allele freq. of control, OR: odds ratios, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval, * rs4745122 is located ~8.9Kb proximal to TMEM2.
Figure 2Manhattan plot for results of GWAS. a) Ashkenazi Jewish, b) NINDS and c) CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009. Manhattan plot of GWAS results of testing for association with PD. Horizontal axis is the genomic position, and vertical axis is -log10 (p-value) in 3 datasets. Blue line indicates the threshold of genome-wide significance level (Ashkenazi Jewish, p = 9.5×10-8; NINDS, p = 9.7×10-8; CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009, p = 1.5×10-7).
Figure 3Regional Association Plots for SNPs significant in the association analysis in the Ashkenazi Jewish dataset a) . It shows -log10 (p-value) from association analysis for all SNPs in the region around the top SNP (surrounding 1000 kb total). X-axis shows position of the SNPs along chromosome; Y-axis gives -log10(p-value). P-values were obtained from GWAS in each dataset. Y-axis in the right shows recombination rate (cM/Mb). r2 shows measure of the LD between this SNP and target SNP.
Figure 4Single point and haplotype analysis of . 2-SNP sliding window analysis the strongest p-value was present from the exhaustive search.
MAPT-NSF and MAPT-WNT3 interaction in the Ashkenazi Jewish Dataset: Multivariate logistic regression*
| Ashkenazi Jewish | NINDS | CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single point | rs1981997 | rs183211 | rs415430 | P-value | OR | 95% CI | P-value | OR | 95% CI | P-value | OR | 95% CI |
| 0.0009118 | 0.58 | 0.42-0.90 | 0.07504 | 0.86 | 0.73-1.01 | 0.0001569 | 0.72 | 0.61-0.86 | ||||
| 6.68 × 10-5 | 0.54 | 0.40-0.73 | 0.1015 | 0.87 | 0.74-1.02 | 0.001375 | 0.77 | 0.65-0.90 | ||||
| 8.59 × 10-5 | 0.54 | 0.30-0.74 | 0.002397 | 0.77 | 0.65-0.91 | N/A | ||||||
| 2-mer | rs1981997 | rs183211 | rs415430 | P-value | Freq. Cases | Freq. Controls | P-value | Freq. Cases | Freq. Controls | P-value | Freq. Cases | Freq. Controls |
| 0.6657 | 0.2634 | 0.7491 | 0.7386 | |||||||||
| A | C | 0.2118 | 0.0084 | 0.1986 | 0.0157 | 0.1059 | 0.0128 | |||||
| G | T | 0.3211 | 0.0466 | 0.2344 | 0.0364 | 0.9238 | 0.0326 | |||||
| 0.1604 | 0.1685 | 0.1636 | ||||||||||
| 0.1559 | 0.1647 | |||||||||||
| 0.2912 | 0.0456 | 0.0081 | ||||||||||
| T | T | 0.2408 | 0.0512 | 0.2133 | 0.0395 | |||||||
| 0.6125 | 0.7469 | N/A | ||||||||||
| 3-mer | 0.156 | 0.1626 | ||||||||||
| 0.3544 | 0.0445 | 0.0081 | ||||||||||
| G | T | T | 0.2446 | 0.0450 | 0.2758 | 0.0350 | ||||||
| A | C | T | 0.1172 | 0.0066 | 0.2187 | 0.0163 | ||||||
| 0.6137 | 0.0518 | 0.7361 | N/A | |||||||||
*Adjusted for age and sex. Age refers to age at onset for affected individuals, and age at examination for unaffected individuals. OR: odds ratios, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; P-values for allelic/haplotype association; Single point shows the protective allele of each SNP; N/A, SNP rs415430 is not available in PD/CIDR data.
Figure 5Association and haplotype analysis of . a) Single point analysis plus 2 haplotype analyses: with vs. without the mutation in Ashkenazi Jewish. b) Single and haplotype analyses without mutation in NINDS. c) Single and haplotype analyses without mutation in CIDR/Pankratz et al 2009. 2-SNP sliding window, the strongest p-value was present from the exhaustive search.
Figure 6Single point and haplotype analysis of . 2-SNP sliding window, the strongest p-value was present from the exhaustive search.