Literature DB >> 2181244

[Detection of amastigotes in cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis using the immunoperoxidase method, using polyclonal antibody: sensibility and specificity compared with conventional methods of diagnosis].

G Salinas1, L Valderrama, G Palma, G Montes, N G Saravia.   

Abstract

The indirect immunoperoxidase method was evaluated in 265 biopsies with the purpose of increasing the sensitivity of the diagnostic histopathology of tegumentary lesions caused by subspecies of the Leishmania braziliensis complex. A diagnosis of leishmaniasis was established by parasitological methods (181) or clinical criteria (12) in 193 patients (72.8%). In the latter group of confirmed cases standard histochemistry and immunoperoxidase were compared with direct examination of tissue scraping and culture of lesion aspirates. The detection and localization of amastigotes was more efficient using the immunoperoxidase method (61.3%) than conventional histopathology with hematoxilin and eosin (34.6%) or direct examination of tissue scraping (43.9%). However, culture of lesion aspirates was the most sensitive procedure (89.8%). The efficiency of the immunoperoxidase method was greater in recent lesions, being positive in 75% of cases with less than 3 months evolution, while 55.6%, 37.5%, and 21.1% of cases with lesion evolution of 3-5.9, 6-11, and 12 months or greater, respectively, were positive. The combined use of the direct examination of lesion scraping and immunoperoxidase applied to histological sections of the biopsy from the lesion border allowed an etiologic diagnosis of 72% of confirmed cases. Cross-reactivity was observed with Paracoccidioides braziliensis but not with Mycobacterium leprae, Sporothrix schenckii, or Histoplasma capsulatum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2181244     DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761989000100010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz        ISSN: 0074-0276            Impact factor:   2.743


  6 in total

Review 1.  Leishmania and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: the first 10 years.

Authors:  J Alvar; C Cañavate; B Gutiérrez-Solar; M Jiménez; F Laguna; R López-Vélez; R Molina; J Moreno
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Imaging Leishmania major Antigens in Experimentally Infected Macrophages and Dermal Scrapings from Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Lesions in Tunisia.

Authors:  Nasreddine Saïdi; Yousr Galaï; Meriem Ben-Abid; Thouraya Boussoffara; Ines Ben-Sghaier; Karim Aoun; Aïda Bouratbine
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-04

Review 3.  Leishmaniases of the New World: current concepts and implications for future research.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; R B Tesh
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Dual Role of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I in American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Carolina de O Mendes-Aguiar; Camilla Lopes-Siqueira; Fabrício Pettito-Assis; Márcia Pereira-Oliveira; Manoel Paes de Oliveira-Neto; Claude Pirmez; Alda Maria Da-Cruz; Hiro Goto
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.818

5.  Anti-mitochondrial Tryparedoxin Peroxidase Monoclonal Antibody-Based Immunohistochemistry for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Mariana Lourenço Freire; Felipe Dutra Rego; Karine Ferreira Lopes; Lucélia Antunes Coutinho; Rafaella Fortini Queiroz Grenfell; Daniel Moreira Avelar; Gláucia Cota; Marcelo Antônio Pascoal-Xavier; Edward Oliveira
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  American tegumentary leishmaniasis: effectiveness of an immunohistochemical protocol for the detection of Leishmania in skin.

Authors:  Cibele Fontes Alves; Cintia Fontes Alves; Maria Marta Figueiredo; Carolina Carvalho Souza; George Luiz Lins Machado-Coelho; Maria Norma Melo; Washington Luiz Tafuri; Pedro Raso; Rodrigo Pedro Soares; Wagner Luiz Tafuri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.