| Literature DB >> 21811427 |
Wonbeak Yoo1, Hae-Yun Jung, Seungjoon Lim, Jae Sook Sung, Kyong Hwa Park, Jeong Seon Ryu, Sang Won Shin, Jun Suk Kim, Jae Hong Seo, Yeul Hong Kim.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The genetic alteration of the janus kinases (JAKs), non-receptor tyrosine kinase, is related to the development of human cancers. However, little is known about how the sequence variation of JAK3 contributes to the development of lung cancer. This study investigated whether polymorphisms at the promoter region of the JAK3 gene are associated with the risk of lung cancer in the Korean population.Entities:
Keywords: Haplotypes; Janus kinase 3; Korea; Lung cancer; Polymorphism
Year: 2011 PMID: 21811427 PMCID: PMC3138914 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2011.43.2.108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1598-2998 Impact factor: 4.679
Baseline characteristics of the study population
Polymorphisms in the JAK3 gene identified in 24 lung cancer patients
Bold data indicates single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped in a larger population (n=819). JAK3, janus tyrosine kinase3.
Fig. 1Map of polymorphisms, haplotypes, and linkage disequilibrium (LD) coefficients in janus tyrosine kinase3 (JAK3) gene. (A) The location of 8 polymorphisms in the JAK3 gene on chromosome 19p13.1. Asterisks indicated polymorphisms that were genotyped in a larger population. The frequencies of polymorphisms were based on sequencing data (n=24). The first base of the translation site was denoted as nucleotide +1. (B) Haplotypes of the promoter region in JAK3 gene. (C) Linkage disequilibrium coefficient (|D'|) among JAK3 gene. Two polymorphisms, including +64 A>G and +227 G>A were used for construction of haplotype. The LD between the polymorphisms was quantified using the Haploview program ver. 3.2.
Logistic analysis of JAK3 polymorphisms and their association with the risk of lung cancer
Values are presented as number (%). Logistic regression models were used to calculate the aORs, 95% CIs and the corresponding p-values of codominant (minor allele homozygotes vs. heterozygotes vs major allele homozygotes), dominant (minor allele homozygotes + heterozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes), and recessive (minor allele homozygotes vs. heterozygotes+major allele homozygotes) models whilst controlling for age and sex as covariates. aORs and 95% CI were calculated by logistic regression and adjusted for age and sex. JAK3, janus tyrosine kinase3; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. a)Haplotype consisting of markers -642 G>A,+64 A>G and +227 G>A, b)Haplotype consisting of markers -642 G>A and +64 A>G.
Association analysis of JAK3 promoter haplotypes (-672 G>A and +64 A>G) in lung cancer
Values are presented as number (%). Logistic regression models were used to calculate the aORs, 95% CIs and the corresponding p-values of codominant (minor allele homozygotes vs. heterozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes), dominant (minor allele homozygotes+heterozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes), and recessive (minor allele homozygotes vs. heterozygotes+major allele homozygotes) models whilst controlling for age and sex as covariates. aORs and 95% CI were calculated by logistic regression and adjusted for age and sex. Bold data indicated p-values <0.05. JAK3, janus tyrosine kinase3; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant. a)p-values were calculated for multiple testing using Bonferroni's inequality method.